MDL Track
MDL 3084
N.D. Cal.
Uber passenger sexual assault
3,291 pending
Transportation Safety · claims alleging Uber failed to protect riders from sexual assault and violent incidents
Defendant
Uber Technologies, Inc.
MDL / Track
MDL 3084
N.D. Cal.
Judge
Judge Charles R. Breyer
Plaintiffs
3,000 pending
Bellwether / Trial
Settlement Status
Track litigations for free. Save this matter, capture notes, and monitor live signals.
Case overview
Uber Technologies Inc. faces over 2,700 pending federal lawsuits in MDL No. 3084 (In re: Uber Technologies, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation), consolidated before Judge Charles R. Breyer in the Northern District of California. The first federal bellwether trial is scheduled for December 8, 2025, following Breyer's July 2025 ruling dismissing fraud and product liability claims while preserving negligence theories and claims related to the app's lack of gender-matching options. Plaintiffs allege Uber failed to implement adequate driver screening and safety protocols despite receiving thousands of assault reports annually.
Causation Theory
Plaintiffs' Master Long-Form Complaint (Dkt. 269, filed Feb. 15, 2024) alleges Uber's transportation model created elevated assault risk by placing intoxicated passengers alone in vehicles with strangers—conditions Uber's safety marketing obscured. Uber's 2017-2018 U.S. Safety Reports documented thousands of sexual assault reports. The causation theory centers on operational choices: inadequate background checks, absence of gender-matching features, and failure to disclose driver misconduct histories in app notifications despite possessing that data.
Case Management Orders
Litigation status
MDL 3084 is in active bellwether phase before Judge Charles R. Breyer in the Northern District of California. The first federal bellwether trial concluded February 2026 with an $8.5 million verdict for plaintiff Jaylynn Dean. Second bellwether trial involving plaintiff 'WHB 823' is scheduled for jury selection April 13, 2026. Daubert and summary judgment motions were due March 10, 2026 per joint pretrial schedule.
MDL Track
MDL 3084
N.D. Cal.
Uber passenger sexual assault
3,291 pending
State Court Activity
California JCCP No. 5188 proceeding in parallel; at least one state trial completed September 2025 with split verdict
MDL 3084 Leadership
Plaintiff Leadership
Co-Lead Counsel
Co-Lead Counsel & Liaison Counsel
Federal/State Liaison Counsel
Steering Committee Member
Defense Leadership
Co-Lead Counsel
Geographic exposure
Uber's US Safety Reports document 3,842 severe sexual assault reports (2019-2020) and thousands more 2017-2022; 80,000 drivers removed via continued background checks. MDL 3084 spans all 50 states with 2,700+ pending federal actions as of late 2025.
Vicarious liability under respondeat superior and common carrier non-delegable duty theories survived dismissal per Judge Charles R. Breyer's August 15, 2024 order (Pretrial Order No. 17, Dkt. 384). San Francisco Superior Court coordinated proceeding (No. CJC21005188) involved 1,201 plaintiffs as of 2024 per Doe v. Uber, A167458/A167709. California Court of Appeal First Appellate District affirmed forum non conveniens stays for non-California incidents June 24, 2024.
TNC statute bars most vicarious liability unless plaintiffs prove gross negligence; negligence claims preserved per MDL 3084 Pretrial Order No. 17 (Dkt. 387, August 15, 2024). Jane Doe LSA 35 (2017 assault) subject to forum non conveniens stay.
Jane Doe WHBE 3 assault (January 13, 2020) subject to forum non conveniens stay; California Court of Appeal found adequate alternative forum exists. Incident location outside California with non-California plaintiff and assailant per A167458.
Uber filed motion to dismiss under Illinois law as one of five selected states in MDL 3084 coordinated discovery; specific ruling not detailed in available materials.
Uber filed motion to dismiss under New York law as one of five selected states in MDL 3084 coordinated discovery; specific ruling not detailed in available materials.
Uber filed motion to dismiss under Florida law as one of five selected states in MDL 3084 coordinated discovery; specific ruling not detailed in available materials.
MDL 3084 centralized 22 actions October 4, 2023 (JPML Transfer Order, 699 F.Supp.3d 1396); Master Long-Form Complaint filed February 15, 2024 (Case No. 3:23-MD-03084-CRB, Dkt. 269); 2,700+ pending lawsuits as of late 2025; first federal bellwether trial scheduled early 2026.
Key defendants
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Role: Platform Operator
Core defendant in MDL 3084. Aggressive motion practice on state-law dismissal; PTO 17 (Aug. 15, 2024) trimmed claims but preserved negligence and common carrier theories. Currently contesting protective order enforcement (Dkt. 3695, Aug. 13, 2025). Terms-of-use arbitration arguments rejected by JPML and district court.
Rasier, LLC
Role: Subsidiary Operating Entity
Named alongside Uber Technologies in master complaint and all dispositive motions. Co-moving party on enforcement of protective order (Dkt. 3695). No independent settlement posture observed; indemnity from parent likely.
Rasier-CA, LLC
Role: California Operating Subsidiary
Third entity in defendant trifecta per Master Long-Form Complaint (Dkt. 269, Feb. 15, 2024). Joins all Uber defensive filings. Minimal distinct exposure; appears structural for state regulatory compliance.
| Defendant | Role | Intelligence Note |
|---|---|---|
| Uber Technologies, Inc. | Platform Operator | Core defendant in MDL 3084. Aggressive motion practice on state-law dismissal; PTO 17 (Aug. 15, 2024) trimmed claims but preserved negligence and common carrier theories. Currently contesting protective order enforcement (Dkt. 3695, Aug. 13, 2025). Terms-of-use arbitration arguments rejected by JPML and district court. |
| Rasier, LLC | Subsidiary Operating Entity | Named alongside Uber Technologies in master complaint and all dispositive motions. Co-moving party on enforcement of protective order (Dkt. 3695). No independent settlement posture observed; indemnity from parent likely. |
| Rasier-CA, LLC | California Operating Subsidiary | Third entity in defendant trifecta per Master Long-Form Complaint (Dkt. 269, Feb. 15, 2024). Joins all Uber defensive filings. Minimal distinct exposure; appears structural for state regulatory compliance. |
Timeline
Doe v. Uber survives dismissal motion
N.D. Cal. Judge Susan Illston denies in part Uber's motion to dismiss sexual assault claims, allowing negligence and respondeat superior theories to proceed. Case No. 15-cv-04670-SI, 184 F.Supp.3d 774.
Uber drops forced arbitration
Uber eliminates mandatory arbitration clauses for sexual assault survivors, permitting open court litigation. Policy change follows mounting public pressure.
First U.S. Safety Report published
Uber discloses thousands of reported sexual assault incidents, marking first public acknowledgment of scale. Report covers 2017-2018 data.
Second Safety Report reveals continued assaults
Uber publishes updated safety data documenting thousands of additional sexual assault reports for 2019-2020.
MDL 3084 created
JPML consolidates 22 Uber passenger sexual assault actions in N.D. Cal. under Judge Charles R. Breyer. In re Uber Techs., Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litig., 699 F.Supp.3d 1396 (J.P.M.L. 2023).
Master Long-Form Complaint filed
Plaintiffs submit administrative master complaint defining common discovery scope. Case No. 3:23-md-03084-CRB, Doc. 269.
Breyer rules on motions to dismiss
Judge Breyer issues Pretrial Order No. 17, preserving negligence claims and California vicarious liability theories while granting dismissal of certain claims with leave to amend. MDL No. 3084.
Defense verdict in individual trial
Jury returns verdict for Uber in individual state-court sexual assault trial, finding no legal responsibility for plaintiff's injuries.
Plaintiffs allege discovery delays
Plaintiffs' counsel claim Uber delayed producing important discovery documents. MDL 3084 pending actions exceed 2,700.
Statute of limitations
MDL 3084 (N.D. Cal., Judge Chhabria) now exceeds 3,188 plaintiffs as of February 2026. California JCCP runs parallel with separate state bellwether track. Hawaii plaintiff filed August 2023 incident just before SOL deadline—monitor 2023 incidents in short-SOL states closely. Federal forum selection critical for Florida and Illinois plaintiffs given restrictive state SOLs and MDL court's 2024 dismissal rulings.
California
10 years from assault or 3 years from discovery
Rule: CCP §340.16
Discovery: 3 years from reasonable discovery of injury and causal link
First MDL bellwether trial completed January 2026 ($8.5M verdict); California JCCP active with separate state bellwether track
Colorado
No civil SOL for assaults on/after January 1, 2022
Rule: SB21-073 eliminated civil SOL for sexual misconduct occurring on or after 1/1/2022
Legacy pre-2022 claims: 2 years general PI SOL applies; confirm retroactivity for 2019-2021 incidents
⚠Florida
2 years
Rule: F.S. 95.11(3)(a); general personal injury SOL applies to sexual assault civil claims
Discovery: Limited; MDL court rejected discovery-based tolling arguments October 2024
MDL Judge Chhabria dismissed most Florida state-law claims October 2024 but preserved vicarious liability for pre-TNC statute incidents; punitive damages claims survived. Federal forum selection critical given restrictive 2-year window
Illinois
2 years from incident
Rule: 735 ILCS 5/13-202; general personal injury SOL
Discovery: Rejected for Uber assault claims; July 2024 dismissal held reporting to Uber defeats delayed discovery argument
MDL court upheld some vicarious liability claims for pre-TNC statute incidents; punitive damages preserved. Federal forum critical given restrictive SOL
New York
3 years from assault
Rule: CPLR 214(5) intentional tort; 3-year general PI for negligence
Discovery: Childhood sexual abuse: revival window closed; age-55 lookback applies only to claims timely under prior law
Adult Uber assault claims face strict 3-year limit; Child Victims Act revival period expired August 2021
Texas
5 years from assault for intentional torts; 2 years for negligence
Rule: Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §16.003 (negligence); §16.0045 (sexual assault intentional torts)
MDL court dismissed most Texas claims August 2024 but preserved negligence claims; products liability and UCL claims dismissed
Arizona
2 years from incident
Rule: A.R.S. §12-542; general personal injury
First federal bellwether verdict: $8.5 million awarded February 5, 2026 (Phoenix); screening window stable
| State | SOL | Rule | Discovery Rule | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| California | 10 years from assault or 3 years from discovery | CCP §340.16 | 3 years from reasonable discovery of injury and causal link | First MDL bellwether trial completed January 2026 ($8.5M verdict); California JCCP active with separate state bellwether track |
| Colorado | No civil SOL for assaults on/after January 1, 2022 | SB21-073 eliminated civil SOL for sexual misconduct occurring on or after 1/1/2022 | — | Legacy pre-2022 claims: 2 years general PI SOL applies; confirm retroactivity for 2019-2021 incidents |
| ⚠Florida | 2 years | F.S. 95.11(3)(a); general personal injury SOL applies to sexual assault civil claims | Limited; MDL court rejected discovery-based tolling arguments October 2024 | MDL Judge Chhabria dismissed most Florida state-law claims October 2024 but preserved vicarious liability for pre-TNC statute incidents; punitive damages claims survived. Federal forum selection critical given restrictive 2-year window |
| Illinois | 2 years from incident | 735 ILCS 5/13-202; general personal injury SOL | Rejected for Uber assault claims; July 2024 dismissal held reporting to Uber defeats delayed discovery argument | MDL court upheld some vicarious liability claims for pre-TNC statute incidents; punitive damages preserved. Federal forum critical given restrictive SOL |
| New York | 3 years from assault | CPLR 214(5) intentional tort; 3-year general PI for negligence | Childhood sexual abuse: revival window closed; age-55 lookback applies only to claims timely under prior law | Adult Uber assault claims face strict 3-year limit; Child Victims Act revival period expired August 2021 |
| Texas | 5 years from assault for intentional torts; 2 years for negligence | Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §16.003 (negligence); §16.0045 (sexual assault intentional torts) | — | MDL court dismissed most Texas claims August 2024 but preserved negligence claims; products liability and UCL claims dismissed |
| Arizona | 2 years from incident | A.R.S. §12-542; general personal injury | — | First federal bellwether verdict: $8.5 million awarded February 5, 2026 (Phoenix); screening window stable |
Live intelligence
AI litigation brief
Uber Assault remains mid-stage / active mdl with 137 current signals in the accepted feed.
Overview
MDL 3084 is in active bellwether phase before Judge Charles R. Breyer in the Northern District of California. The first federal bellwether trial concluded February 2026 with an $8.5 million verdict for plaintiff Jaylynn Dean. Second bellwether trial involving plaintiff 'WHB 823' is scheduled for jury selection April 13, 2026. Daubert and summary judgment motions were due March 10, 2026 per joint pretrial schedule.
Key developments
Trajectory
Court filings and press coverage are both active in MDL 3084, pointing to sustained litigation pressure rather than a one-off headline cycle. 5 live sources are contributing current context.
Editorial intelligence
MDL 3084 should stay on the lead docket watch because it is the primary consolidation vehicle for Uber Assault.
Generated Apr 28, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
137 events detected
Google News (29)
Sexual Assault Lawsuit Against Uber Sparks Safety Concerns Ahead of M-A Prom - M-A Chronicle
Effort to hold Uber legally responsible for sexual assaults by drivers heads to ballot - Los Angeles Times
Redwood City woman sues Uber over sexual assault allegations - Redwood City Pulse
Uber found liable for actions of driver who grabbed passenger's inner thigh - CBS News
Federal jury finds Uber liable for actions of driver who grabbed passenger's inner thigh - Dayton Daily News
Uber loses another US driver sex assault trial, ordered to pay $5,000 - Reuters
Jury Awards $5K Verdict in Second Uber Sexual Assault Bellwether Trial - Law.com
Second Jury Finds Uber Responsible for Sexual Assault by a Driver - The New York Times
New Uber Sexual Assault Trial Underway in North Carolina Federal Court - Law.com
Judge rules Uber owes ‘non-delegable duty’ to passengers in sexual assault MDL - Top Class Actions
Teams With Phila. Ties Open Second Sex Assault Trial Against Uber - Law.com
Second Sexual Assault Trial Opens Against Uber in North Carolina Federal Court - Law.com
Uber says NC woman alleging driver assault has ‘zero proof.’ A jury will decide - Charlotte Observer
Uber Faces Second Sexual Assault Trial After $8.5M Verdict - National Today
Uber heads to 2nd driver sexual assault trial after $8.5M verdict - LiveNOW from FOX
Uber Faces Second Driver Sexual Assault Trial Following $8.5M Verdict - Insurance Journal
Uber faces second driver sexual assault trial following $8.5 million verdict - Reuters
Uber faces second driver sexual assault trial following $8.5 million verdict By Reuters - Investing.com
Opinion: What first federal Uber sexual assault trial means for riders — including in Connecticut - Hartford Courant
Uber liable for damages after driver allegedly raped passenger - Mashable
Uber Sexual Abuser Sent to Prison as RideSharing App Faces Legal Liability - Gainesville Public Information Services
Legal Bay Pre Settlement Funding Announces Uber to Initiate "Woman Driver Only" Option Due to Ongoing Rideshare Lawsuits Involving Sexual Assault - PR Newswire
Legal Bay Pre Settlement Funding Announces Uber to Initiate "Woman Driver Only" Option Due to Ongoing Rideshare Lawsuits Involving Sexual Assault - PR Newswire
Uber Sexual Assault Verdict Raises Liability Questions - The Legal Examiner
Uber Sexual Assault Verdict Raises Liability Questions - The Legal Examiner
Trials Probe Tech Companies' Responsibility for Sexual Assaults and Abuse - Tech Policy Press
Trials Probe Tech Companies' Responsibility for Sexual Assaults and Abuse - Tech Policy Press
Uber held liable, ordered to pay $8.5 million in driver rape suit - cnbc.com
Uber must pay $8.5 million in driver sexual assault case, jury says. Here’s what it could mean for thousands of similar cases - CNN
No recent PubMed signals. Monitoring is active — this section updates automatically.
Uber Technologies, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation
PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT against Rasier, LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-21910628.). Filed by JLG 290. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lizik, Dana) (Filed on 4/24/2026) (Entered: 04/24/2026)
Uber Technologies, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation
PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT against Rasier, LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-21910500.). Filed by JLG 289. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lizik, Dana) (Filed on 4/24/2026) (Entered: 04/24/2026)
Uber Technologies, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation
PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT against Rasier, LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-21910290.). Filed by JLG 288. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lizik, Dana) (Filed on 4/24/2026) (Entered: 04/24/2026)
Uber Technologies, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation
PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT T.G.03 against Rasier, LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-21910082.). Filed by T.G.03. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Luhana, Roopal) (Filed on 4/24/2026) (Entered: 04/24/2026)
Uber Technologies, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation
PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT A.T.01 against Rasier, LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-21909695.). Filed by A.T.01. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Luhana, Roopal) (Filed on 4/24/2026) (Entered: 04/24/2026)
Uber Technologies, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation
PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT against Discord Inc., Roblox Corporation, Uber Technologies, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-21909327.). Filed by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Siko, Robert) (Filed on 4/24/2026) (Entered: 04/24/2026)
Uber Technologies, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation
PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT S.W.01 against Rasier, LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-21909144.). Filed by S.W.01. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Luhana, Roopal) (Filed on 4/24/2026) (Entered: 04/24/2026)
Uber Technologies, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation
PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT against Rasier, LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-21905813.). Filed by Jane Roe CL 309. (Domer, Jennifer) (Filed on 4/23/2026) (Entered: 04/23/2026)
Uber Technologies, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation
PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-21903952.). Filed by J. C. T.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lang, Taylor) (Filed on 4/23/2026) (Entered: 04/23/2026)
Uber Technologies, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation
PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT on behalf of Jane Doe PLG (A.N.) against Rasier CA-LLC, Rasier LLC, Uber Technologies Inc ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-21901027.). Filed by Jane Doe PLG (A.N.). (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Tonkin, Timothy) (Filed on 4/22/2026) (Entered: 04/22/2026)
No recent legislative signals. Monitoring is active — this section updates automatically.
Workbench
Sign in to save litigations, capture notes, and monitor live signals. Sign in for unlimited.
LexGenius Ranking
76Score
Court, news, and regulatory activity are elevated
Monitoring
Live
monitoring
Last: Apr 28, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
Next: 46:17
Source Monitoring
PACER
PACER
Google News
PubMed
Event feed
137
events detected
AI Brief
Uber Assault remains mid-stage / active mdl with 137 current signals in the accepted feed.
Overview
MDL 3084 is in active bellwether phase before Judge Charles R. Breyer in the Northern District of California. The first federal bellwether trial concluded February 2026 with an $8.5 million verdict for plaintiff Jaylynn Dean. Second bellwether trial involving plaintiff 'WHB 823' is scheduled for jury selection April 13, 2026. Daubert and summary judgment motions were due March 10, 2026 per joint pretrial schedule.
Key developments
PACER court filing on Apr 24: Uber Technologies, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation. ‖ M-A Chronicle news on Apr 24: Sexual Assault Lawsuit Against Uber Sparks Safety Concerns Ahead of M-A Prom - M-A Chronicle.
Generated Apr 28, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC
Tracked MDLs
MDL 3084
N.D. Cal.
Uber passenger sexual assault