State Court Activity
California JCCP consolidates state-court cases under single judge for pretrial discovery; 91+ lawsuits filed under California lookback window; Arizona Supreme Court ruling August 2026 limits clergy reporting claims in that state
Institutional Abuse · civil actions alleging abuse and institutional failures within LDS-affiliated settings
Defendant
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
MDL / Track
MDL No. 3150
JPML (consolidation denied)
Judge
Judge Karen K. Caldwell
Plaintiffs
ACTIVE
Bellwether / Trial
Settlement Status
Track litigations for free. Save this matter, capture notes, and monitor live signals.
Case overview
Survivors are pursuing civil claims against the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints alleging systemic failures to report child sexual abuse and protect victims from known abusers. In February 2026, a plaintiff identified as "J.H." filed suit in Pulaski County Circuit Court against the Little Rock Pinnacle Mountain Ward, alleging church leaders interrogated her at age 15 after she disclosed stepfather abuse, implied she was responsible for her own victimization, and required her to attend services unsupervised alongside her abuser after his 1993 guilty plea. The filing was timed to beat Arkansas's Justice for Vulnerable Victims of Sexual Abuse Act deadline and invokes the Delayed Discovery Act, citing PTSD and depression diagnoses that delayed recognition of harm until 2022-2023.
Causation Theory
The causation theory centers on institutional practices that allegedly re-traumatize child abuse survivors: mandatory disclosure to bishops triggers interrogation protocols rather than protection, and church leaders apply theological frameworks that shift blame to victims. The 2022 AP investigation of nearly 12,000 pages of sealed records from West Virginia litigation documented the help line's function in diverting accusations from authorities to church attorneys. In the Arkansas case, specific mechanisms include unsupervised access to abusers through coerced church attendance and public performances of abuser contrition that survivors were forced to witness.
Litigation status
The JPML denied MDL consolidation on April 3, 2025, finding claims too fact-specific for centralized treatment under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 (Order, MDL No. 3150, Judge Karen K. Caldwell). Litigation proceeds through California's Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding (JCCP) for state-court cases and individual federal actions nationwide. The Arizona Supreme Court issued a major ruling August 5, 2026, holding that LDS Church leaders are not bound to report sexual abuse confessions under Arizona's clergy-penitent privilege, dismissing a Cochise County case.
State Court Activity
California JCCP consolidates state-court cases under single judge for pretrial discovery; 91+ lawsuits filed under California lookback window; Arizona Supreme Court ruling August 2026 limits clergy reporting claims in that state
Geographic exposure
California serves as primary intake jurisdiction for revived SOL claims under AB 218 (revival window through 2022-2023, with ongoing filings for latent claims). Two confirmed federal cases active in E.D. Cal. and C.D. Cal. as of 2025. National exposure concentrated in states with extended SOL revival windows and significant LDS population centers: California, Arizona, Utah, Idaho. Help line documentation from West Virginia litigation fuels institutional liability theories nationwide.
Active federal litigation: Jane Roe AB 51 v. Doe 1, 2:24-cv-03488 (E.D. Cal. 2025), alleging grooming and sexual abuse by Aaronic Priesthood leaders at Modesto California North Stake; claims include negligence, negligent supervision, and concealment. Court granted ex parte application naming Church Corporation, Temple Corporation, and Modesto Stake as defendants. Diversity jurisdiction remand dispute resolved against plaintiff April 2025.
Active federal litigation: John Roe CS 88 v. Doe 1, 2:24-cv-11154 (C.D. Cal. 2025), alleging 1991-1992 abuse by church leader at San Luis Obispo California Stake. Court denied remand February 2025, holding SLO Stake lacks independent legal existence and possesses Utah citizenship of parent Church. Claims include negligent hiring, supervision, and failure to warn.
Significant latent claimant population: California law firms report active intake of adults with LDS abuse histories, including cross-state claimants now residing in California who may file under AB 218 revived SOL. Jurisdictional analysis ongoing for claims involving Utah, Arizona, Idaho origin conduct. No verified publicly filed state court decisions as of early 2025.
Documented litigation events: AP investigation (Aug. 2022) identified sealed records from West Virginia litigation revealing help line procedures; Arizona cases referenced including Adams family matter where clergy-penitent privilege upheld by Arizona Supreme Court. PBS/AP reporting identified systemic hotline protocols allegedly diverting abuse reports from law enforcement to church attorneys.
Source litigation for national reporting: AP obtained ~12,000 pages sealed records from unrelated child sex abuse lawsuit, providing basis for 2022 investigation into LDS help line system. Documents described as most detailed examination of church attorney involvement in abuse reporting decisions.
Key defendants
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Role: Primary Institutional Defendant
Utah corporation sole, consistently named Doe 1 in California § 340.1 filings. Aggressive removal strategy to federal court; courts split on whether stakes are independent for diversity purposes. See 2:24-cv-08668-SVW (remanded); 2:24-cv-03488-DJC (remand denied). Defending on ecclesiastical abstention and lack of duty to protect.
Temple Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Role: Integrated Auxiliary
Utah nonprofit, named Doe 2. Holds property/assets for church. No separate litigation posture observed; indemnity flows through parent. Removal papers treat as non-diverse Utah entity.
Palmdale California Stake
Role: Ecclesiastical Subunit
Named defendant in 2:24-cv-08668-SVW. Court found stake not independently incorporated, remanded to state court. Template for other California stake-level entities facing similar jurisdictional challenges.
| Defendant | Role | Intelligence Note |
|---|---|---|
| The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints | Primary Institutional Defendant | Utah corporation sole, consistently named Doe 1 in California § 340.1 filings. Aggressive removal strategy to federal court; courts split on whether stakes are independent for diversity purposes. See 2:24-cv-08668-SVW (remanded); 2:24-cv-03488-DJC (remand denied). Defending on ecclesiastical abstention and lack of duty to protect. |
| Temple Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints | Integrated Auxiliary | Utah nonprofit, named Doe 2. Holds property/assets for church. No separate litigation posture observed; indemnity flows through parent. Removal papers treat as non-diverse Utah entity. |
| Palmdale California Stake | Ecclesiastical Subunit | Named defendant in 2:24-cv-08668-SVW. Court found stake not independently incorporated, remanded to state court. Template for other California stake-level entities facing similar jurisdictional challenges. |
Timeline
Bishops helpline established
The LDS Church establishes a confidential hotline directing bishops who receive abuse confessions to call church attorneys rather than law enforcement, later identified by plaintiffs as a systemic cover-up mechanism.
Abuse incidents and internal handling
Multiple documented instances of bishops receiving abuse disclosures, calling the helpline, and being advised not to report to law enforcement, with perpetrators allowed to continue accessing victims.
Washington Post investigation published
Major investigative reporting documents the bishops helpline and its alleged use to shield perpetrators from law enforcement, generating significant public and legal attention.
Associated Press follow-up investigation
AP investigation identifies dozens of cases across multiple states where the helpline was used and abuse continued after disclosure to the Church, strengthening systemic liability theories.
California AB 218 filings surge
California's revival window drives significant new filings against LDS entities. California courts' willingness to allow systemic negligence claims attracts national plaintiff counsel.
Senate Finance Committee investigation
US Senate Finance Committee launches investigation into LDS Church finances, indirectly increasing pressure on the Church regarding its abuse response policies and records.
Multiple state court developments
Courts in Utah, Idaho, and California allow systemic negligence claims to proceed past summary judgment, rejecting First Amendment dismissal arguments and advancing cases toward trial.
Legislative mandatory reporter debates
Utah and Idaho legislatures debate removing or narrowing clergy-penitent mandatory reporter exemptions following ongoing litigation and advocacy, potentially expanding future liability.
Statute of limitations
Federal preemption minimal; RLUIPA and First Amendment defenses common in LDS institutional cases. Tolling agreements rare; bankruptcy filings by local stakes or entities may trigger automatic stay. Cross-jurisdictional issues arise with missionary abuse—venue typically where abuse occurred, not domicile. Clergy-penitent privilege varies by state; Utah's privilege is broad but exceptions exist for child abuse reporting.
Utah
No SOL against perpetrators; age 22 against non-perpetrators (4-year discovery rule)
Rule: Utah Code Ann. § 78B-2-308(3): Perpetrator claims unlimited; non-perpetrator claims within 4 years after age 18 or 4 years after discovery, whichever later
Discovery: 4-year discovery rule applies only to non-perpetrator claims; knowledge of abuse and institutional relationships triggers inquiry notice per Colosimo v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Salt Lake, 2005 UT 80
Revival window under § 78B-2-308(7) held unconstitutional for perpetrator claims in Mitchell v. Roberts, 2020 UT 34; 10th Circuit affirmed federal dismissal in Mitchell v. Roberts, 21-4055 (10th Cir. Aug. 9, 2022). Non-perpetrator revival window also likely unconstitutional under same reasoning.
Arizona
Age 30 (revived claims under 2019 law); 2-year discovery rule for repressed memory
Rule: Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-514: Age 30 for child sexual abuse; 2019 revival window closed Dec. 31, 2020; 2023 amendment removed age cap prospectively but did not reopen expired claims
Discovery: 2-year from discovery of injury and causal connection for repressed memory claims
Arizona Court of Appeals has permitted some institutional negligence claims to proceed; revival window closed. No current open window as of August 2026.
California
Age 40 or 5 years from discovery; no SOL for claims after Jan. 1, 2024
Rule: Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 340.1: Age 40 or 5 years from discovery for pre-2024 claims; AB 218 (2019) created 3-year revival window (closed Dec. 31, 2022); SB 331 (2023) eliminated SOL prospectively for claims arising Jan. 1, 2024 or later
Discovery: 5-year from discovery of injury and causal connection
Revival window closed Dec. 31, 2022. Claims arising 2024+ have no SOL. Pre-2024 claims subject to age 40/5-year discovery limit.
Idaho
Age 23 (5 years after age 18)
Rule: Idaho Code § 6-1704: 5 years after victim reaches age 18; no discovery rule for child sexual abuse
Discovery: None for CSA; general discovery rule inapplicable per Idaho precedent
No revival statute enacted. Conservative jurisdiction; legislative efforts failed 2023-2024 session.
Nevada
Age 38 (20 years after age 18) or 3 years from discovery
Rule: Nev. Rev. Stat. § 11.215: Age 38 or 3 years from discovery of injury and causal connection; AB 145 (2021) created 2-year revival window closed Dec. 31, 2023
Discovery: 3-year from discovery of injury and causal connection
Revival window closed Dec. 31, 2023. No current open window.
New York
Age 55; Child Victims Act revival window closed Aug. 14, 2021
Rule: N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 213-c: Age 55 for civil claims; CVA created 2-year revival window (Aug. 14, 2019-Aug. 14, 2021); Adult Survivors Act created 1-year window for adult claims (Nov. 24, 2022-Nov. 24, 2023)
Discovery: None specific; general discovery rule limited
All revival windows closed. Only claims meeting age 55 limit or discovery rule viable.
⚠Washington
Age 38 or 3 years from discovery; no SOL for claims after June 6, 2024
Rule: RCW 4.16.340: Age 38 or 3 years from discovery; HB 1618 (2024) eliminated SOL prospectively for claims arising June 6, 2024 or later; 3-year revival window for expired claims opened June 6, 2024
Discovery: 3-year from discovery of injury and causal connection
Revival window opened June 6, 2024 and closes June 6, 2027. Claims arising June 6, 2024+ have no SOL. URGENT: 3-year revival window closes June 6, 2027.
| State | SOL | Rule | Discovery Rule | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Utah | No SOL against perpetrators; age 22 against non-perpetrators (4-year discovery rule) | Utah Code Ann. § 78B-2-308(3): Perpetrator claims unlimited; non-perpetrator claims within 4 years after age 18 or 4 years after discovery, whichever later | 4-year discovery rule applies only to non-perpetrator claims; knowledge of abuse and institutional relationships triggers inquiry notice per Colosimo v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Salt Lake, 2005 UT 80 | Revival window under § 78B-2-308(7) held unconstitutional for perpetrator claims in Mitchell v. Roberts, 2020 UT 34; 10th Circuit affirmed federal dismissal in Mitchell v. Roberts, 21-4055 (10th Cir. Aug. 9, 2022). Non-perpetrator revival window also likely unconstitutional under same reasoning. |
| Arizona | Age 30 (revived claims under 2019 law); 2-year discovery rule for repressed memory | Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-514: Age 30 for child sexual abuse; 2019 revival window closed Dec. 31, 2020; 2023 amendment removed age cap prospectively but did not reopen expired claims | 2-year from discovery of injury and causal connection for repressed memory claims | Arizona Court of Appeals has permitted some institutional negligence claims to proceed; revival window closed. No current open window as of August 2026. |
| California | Age 40 or 5 years from discovery; no SOL for claims after Jan. 1, 2024 | Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 340.1: Age 40 or 5 years from discovery for pre-2024 claims; AB 218 (2019) created 3-year revival window (closed Dec. 31, 2022); SB 331 (2023) eliminated SOL prospectively for claims arising Jan. 1, 2024 or later | 5-year from discovery of injury and causal connection | Revival window closed Dec. 31, 2022. Claims arising 2024+ have no SOL. Pre-2024 claims subject to age 40/5-year discovery limit. |
| Idaho | Age 23 (5 years after age 18) | Idaho Code § 6-1704: 5 years after victim reaches age 18; no discovery rule for child sexual abuse | None for CSA; general discovery rule inapplicable per Idaho precedent | No revival statute enacted. Conservative jurisdiction; legislative efforts failed 2023-2024 session. |
| Nevada | Age 38 (20 years after age 18) or 3 years from discovery | Nev. Rev. Stat. § 11.215: Age 38 or 3 years from discovery of injury and causal connection; AB 145 (2021) created 2-year revival window closed Dec. 31, 2023 | 3-year from discovery of injury and causal connection | Revival window closed Dec. 31, 2023. No current open window. |
| New York | Age 55; Child Victims Act revival window closed Aug. 14, 2021 | N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 213-c: Age 55 for civil claims; CVA created 2-year revival window (Aug. 14, 2019-Aug. 14, 2021); Adult Survivors Act created 1-year window for adult claims (Nov. 24, 2022-Nov. 24, 2023) | None specific; general discovery rule limited | All revival windows closed. Only claims meeting age 55 limit or discovery rule viable. |
| ⚠Washington | Age 38 or 3 years from discovery; no SOL for claims after June 6, 2024 | RCW 4.16.340: Age 38 or 3 years from discovery; HB 1618 (2024) eliminated SOL prospectively for claims arising June 6, 2024 or later; 3-year revival window for expired claims opened June 6, 2024 | 3-year from discovery of injury and causal connection | Revival window opened June 6, 2024 and closes June 6, 2027. Claims arising June 6, 2024+ have no SOL. URGENT: 3-year revival window closes June 6, 2027. |
Live intelligence
AI litigation brief
LDS Abuse remains active litigation category with 27 current signals in the accepted feed.
Overview
The JPML denied MDL consolidation on April 3, 2025, finding claims too fact-specific for centralized treatment under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 (Order, MDL No. 3150, Judge Karen K. Caldwell). Litigation proceeds through California's Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding (JCCP) for state-court cases and individual federal actions nationwide. The Arizona Supreme Court issued a major ruling August 5, 2026, holding that LDS Church leaders are not bound to report sexual abuse confessions under Arizona's clergy-penitent privilege, dismissing a Cochise County case.
Key developments
Trajectory
Press coverage is active for LDS Abuse. Court-side confirmation through state civil courts and appellate rulings involving institutional abuse claims is the next escalation check.
Editorial intelligence
Editorial coverage should stay tied to source-backed developments and avoid placeholder status copy for LDS Abuse.
Generated Aug 12, 2026, 2:00 AM UTC
27 events detected
Google News (27)
LDS Church leaders not bound to report sexual abuse confessions, Arizona Supreme Court rules - The Salt Lake Tribune
Arizona ruling: Religions don't have to report child sex abuse to authorities - tucson.com
Religious leaders not required to report child abuse, Arizona Supreme Court rules - FOX 13 News Utah
Arizona Supreme Court rules clergy abuse reporting optional - wng.org
LDS church didn't have to report child sex abuse, Arizona court rules - azcentral.com and The Arizona Republic
AZ Supreme Court dismisses LDS Church abuse case in Cochise County - KVOA
High court says churches, not judges, define a ‘confession’ when it comes to reporting child abuse - Arizona Mirror
Arizona Supreme Court sides with LDS Church in 'duty-to-report' abuse case - 12News
Federal appeals court sides with LDS Church in lawsuit over sex abuse settlements - The Salt Lake Tribune
Federal court overturns decision requiring LDS Church to pay settlement in sexual abuse lawsuit - ABC4 Utah
LDS Church May Pursue Abuse Suit Coverage, 10th Circ. Says - Law360
10th Circuit revives Mormon Church's fight with insurers over sex abuse settlements - Courthouse News
Brother of LDS apostle pleads guilty to sexually abusing, enticing minors in Ohio and Utah - ABC4 Utah
Mormon church files motion to dismiss sexual abuse lawsuit - Texarkana Gazette
Mormon church files motion to dismiss sexual abuse lawsuit - The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette
Mormon church files motion to dismiss sexual abuse lawsuit - Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette
Woman sues Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, accuses leaders of concealing sexual abuse in Little Rock - The Arkansas Democrat-Gazette
Deal allows Idaho LDS leader accused of child sexual abuse to avoid sex offender registry - KBOI
Mormon Lawsuit 2026: Payouts, Eligibility, How to File - LawFold.com
The LDS Church has a one-of-a-kind system for tracking abusers. Does it work? - The Salt Lake Tribune
LDS Bishop, Scout Leader Sexually Assaulted Boys: DA | Man In Wheelchair Shot | UCB Bans AI: Patch PM - Patch
40% of Mormons Raised in the U.S. Have Left the Church – Mormon News 5.22.26 | Ep. 2151 - Mormon Stories
40% Of Mormons Raised In U.S. Have Left Church - Jeff Strong’s Torn - Mormon News 5.22.26 | Ep. 2151 Storm Stacey (gkS69resoo) - Fathom Journal
LDS Bishop, Scout Leader Sexually Assaulted Boys: DA | Man In Wheelchair Shot | UCB Bans AI - Patch
Former Livermore bishop charged with child sex abuse - Livermore Vine
Ex-Mormon bishop in Livermore charged with sexually assaulting boys over decade - KTVU
Former Mormon bishop charged with child sex abuse in Livermore - San Francisco Chronicle
No recent PubMed signals. Monitoring is active — this section updates automatically.
No recent court filing signals. Monitoring is active — this section updates automatically.
No recent legislative signals. Monitoring is active — this section updates automatically.
Workbench
Sign in to save litigations, capture notes, and monitor live signals. Sign in for unlimited.
LexGenius Ranking
48Score
Fresh items are present but not yet surging
Monitoring
Live
monitoring
Last: Aug 12, 2026, 2:00 AM UTC
Next: —
Source Monitoring
PACER
PACER
Google News
PubMed
Event feed
27
events detected
AI Brief
LDS Abuse remains active litigation category with 27 current signals in the accepted feed.
Overview
The JPML denied MDL consolidation on April 3, 2025, finding claims too fact-specific for centralized treatment under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 (Order, MDL No. 3150, Judge Karen K. Caldwell). Litigation proceeds through California's Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding (JCCP) for state-court cases and individual federal actions nationwide. The Arizona Supreme Court issued a major ruling August 5, 2026, holding that LDS Church leaders are not bound to report sexual abuse confessions under Arizona's clergy-penitent privilege, dismissing a Cochise County case.
Key developments
The Salt Lake Tribune news on Aug 5: LDS Church leaders not bound to report sexual abuse confessions, Arizona Supreme Court rules - The Salt Lake Tribune.
Generated Aug 12, 2026, 2:00 AM UTC