Dupixent CTCLPENDING
Spinal StimulatorsPENDING
Lyft AssaultNEW MDL
ByHeart FormulaNEW MDL
CartivaNEW MDL
RobloxNEW MDL
AI Chatbot Harm
NEWQUIET
Roundup
ACTIVE
AFFF
ACTIVE
Depo-Provera
ACTIVE
Talc
ACTIVE
PFAS
ACTIVE
NEC Formula
ACTIVE
Bard Hernia Mesh
QUIET
Covidien Hernia Mesh
ACTIVE
Camp Lejeune
ACTIVE
Paraquat
QUIET
Social Media
ACTIVE
PowerPort
ACTIVE
EtO Sterilization
ACTIVE
Hair Relaxer
ACTIVE
Paragard
ACTIVE
Suboxone Teeth
ACTIVE
Uber Assault
ACTIVE
Ozempic Gastroparesis
ACTIVE
Ozempic NAION
MONITOR
Church Abuse
ACTIVE
1,4-Dioxane
ACTIVE
Hotel Trafficking
ACTIVE
Boy Scouts
QUIET
Oxbryta
MONITOR
LDS Abuse
ACTIVE
Keytruda
ACTIVE
Tylenol
QUIET
Assembly of God
MONITOR
LDS MTC
ACTIVE
Royal Rangers
MONITOR
Video Game Addiction
MONITOR
CA Women's Prisons
ACTIVE
Zantac
ACTIVE
Sports Betting
MONITOR
Baby Food Metals
ACTIVE
Benzene Litigation
ACTIVE
Discord Abuse
ACTIVE
Social Media Sextortion
MONITOR
UPF Litigation
MONITOR
46Tracked
28Active
2Pending
Navigation
Dupixent CTCLPENDING
Spinal StimulatorsPENDING
Lyft AssaultNEW MDL
ByHeart FormulaNEW MDL
CartivaNEW MDL
RobloxNEW MDL
AI Chatbot Harm
NEWQUIET
Roundup
ACTIVE
AFFF
ACTIVE
Depo-Provera
ACTIVE
Talc
ACTIVE
PFAS
ACTIVE
NEC Formula
ACTIVE
Bard Hernia Mesh
QUIET
Covidien Hernia Mesh
ACTIVE
Camp Lejeune
ACTIVE
Paraquat
QUIET
Social Media
ACTIVE
PowerPort
ACTIVE
EtO Sterilization
ACTIVE
Hair Relaxer
ACTIVE
Paragard
ACTIVE
Suboxone Teeth
ACTIVE
Uber Assault
ACTIVE
Ozempic Gastroparesis
ACTIVE
Ozempic NAION
MONITOR
Church Abuse
ACTIVE
1,4-Dioxane
ACTIVE
Hotel Trafficking
ACTIVE
Boy Scouts
QUIET
Oxbryta
MONITOR
LDS Abuse
ACTIVE
Keytruda
ACTIVE
Tylenol
QUIET
Assembly of God
MONITOR
LDS MTC
ACTIVE
Royal Rangers
MONITOR
Video Game Addiction
MONITOR
CA Women's Prisons
ACTIVE
Zantac
ACTIVE
Sports Betting
MONITOR
Baby Food Metals
ACTIVE
Benzene Litigation
ACTIVE
Discord Abuse
ACTIVE
Social Media Sextortion
MONITOR
UPF Litigation
MONITOR
46Tracked
28Active
2Pending
LexGenius Logo
LexGeniusYour Edge in Mass Litigation
PricingDaily DocketTrack litigations freeSign in
LexGenius

LexGenius

Your Edge in Mass Litigation

DisclaimerAcceptable UseTermsPrivacyCookie PolicySupport

© 2026 LexGenius. All rights reserved.

Active MDL36 eventsSurvivor Litigation

Sex Trafficking Hotel

Institutional Abuse · claims that hotel operators ignored obvious signs of trafficking and profited from the abuse

Defendant

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

MDL / Track

MDL 3104

S.D. Ohio

Judge

Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley

Plaintiffs

ACTIVE

Bellwether / Trial

$40M verdict for child trafficking victim against United Inn & Suites (N.D. Ga. July 2024)

Settlement Status

  • $24M settlement by Philadelphia Days Inn (Feb. 2023)
  • $6M settlement by Georgia hotel (July 2025)
  • three Philadelphia hotels settled March 2025 (terms undisclosed)
Home/Torts/Sex Trafficking Hotel
SharePost on XShare on BlueskyShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookEmail

Track litigations for free. Save this matter, capture notes, and monitor live signals.

Sign in
← Torts Case overview Litigation status Geographic exposure Key defendants Timeline Statute of limitations Live activity News PubMed Court filings Legislative

Case overview

A wave of federal litigation under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA) targets hotel chains for allegedly enabling sex trafficking by ignoring overt warning signs. In December 2025, Andreozzi + Foote filed suit in the Harrisburg–Hershey region naming Holiday Inn Express, Best Western, Marriott properties, and others, alleging staff witnessed daily cash rentals, bruised victims, and trafficker surveillance yet continued renting rooms. This follows a confidential June 2024 settlement by Red Roof Inns mid-trial in the first hotel sex trafficking case to reach a jury, overseen by Judge Victoria Calvert in the Northern District of Georgia (case filed 2020). At least 42 federal lawsuits are pending against Red Roof Inn across 39 states, with hundreds more victims preparing claims.

Causation Theory

Hotels serve as operational infrastructure for trafficking ventures: analysis of 2018–2019 federal criminal sex trafficking cases found approximately 80% involved exploitation at hotels or motels (Jeng et al., Religions 2022). Traffickers exploit the hospitality industry's anonymity, transient clientele, and room-by-room rental model to create controlled environments for commercial sexual exploitation. Plaintiffs allege corporate defendants observed and ignored established indicators including cash payments for short-term stays, excessive linen requests, visible condoms and paraphernalia, victims showing bruising and malnourishment, trafficker surveillance of hallways, and online reviews flagging prostitution activity—yet failed to implement federally available training from DHS, ECPAT-USA, or the American Hotel & Lodging Association.

Case Management Orders

Litigation status

MDL No. 3104 (In re: Hotel Industry Sex Trafficking Litigation (No. II)) was created January 2024 and remains active before Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley in the S.D. Ohio. The MDL succeeded after the JPML denied the first consolidation attempt (MDL 2928) in February 2020. Recent rulings continue to shape beneficiary liability theories under 18 U.S.C. §1595, with courts split on franchisor knowledge standards.

MDL Track

MDL 3104

S.D. Ohio

State Court Activity

Substantial parallel activity in state courts; 56,000+ cases referenced across MO, PA, GA, CA and other jurisdictions per industry reporting

Geographic exposure

Approximately 1,000 represented survivors in Red Roof Inn litigation alone; 115 properties across 39 states implicated. TVPRA claims proliferating against major chains including Wyndham, Choice, Hilton, Marriott, Hyatt, Best Western, Extended Stay America, InterContinental. MDL No. 2928 denied Feb. 5, 2020 (433 F. Supp. 3d 1353); cases proceeding in individual districts with varying SOL windows.

  • Georgia — Smyrna/Atlanta

    Red Roof Inn Corporate Plaza (Smyrna) and North Druid Hills Road (Atlanta). First sex trafficking lawsuit against national hotel brand to reach trial; settled mid-trial June 2024 with 11 plaintiffs. U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Judge Victoria Calvert. Original complaint filed 2020. Evidence: open-air prostitution market, security guards partying with traffickers, 'NO REFUNDS AFTER 15 MINUTES' policy, excessive linen requests, used condom volumes.

  • Ohio — Southern District

    In re Hotel TVPRA Litig., 35 cases consolidated for venue review before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers. April 25, 2023 order lifted stays; venue improper in S.D. Ohio for plaintiffs trafficked outside district. Cases transferred or dismissed for improper venue. Representative dockets: 2:22-cv-1924, 2:22-cv-2682, 2:22-cv-2690, 2:22-cv-2734, 2:22-cv-3080, 2:22-cv-3256, 2:22-cv-3258, 2:22-cv-3340, 2:22-cv-3416, 2:22-cv-3766 through 2:22-cv-3773, 2:22-cv-3774, 2:22-cv-3776, 2:22-cv-3778, 2:22-cv-3782, 2:22-cv-3784, 2:22-cv-3786, 2:22-cv-3787, 2:22-cv-3788, 2:22-cv-3797, 2:22-cv-3798, 2:22-cv-3799, 2:22-cv-3811, 2:22-cv-3837, 2:22-cv-3839, 2:22-cv-3842, 2:22-cv-3844, 2:22-cv-3845, 2:22-cv-3846.

  • California — Stockton

    J.M. v. Choice Hotels Int'l, No. 2:22-cv-00672-KJM-JDP (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2022). Trafficking Feb.-Apr. 2012 at Stockton Rodeway Inn and Stockton Red Roof Inn. Plaintiff forced to solicit buyers in parking lot; staff witnessed pleas for help, bruises, cigarette burns. Court denied motion to dismiss TVPRA claim against franchisors Choice Hotels and Red Roof Inns.

  • Maryland — Aberdeen/Havre de Grace/Edgewood

    Active litigation filed February 2026 in U.S. District Court in Baltimore. Seven Maryland hotels: Budget Inn (Pulaski Highway, Havre de Grace), Budget Inn (South Philadelphia Boulevard, Aberdeen), Days Inn (West Bel Air Avenue, Aberdeen), Super 8 (Beards Hill Road, Aberdeen), Travelodge (West Bel Air Avenue, Aberdeen), Motel 6 (Edgewood Road, Edgewood). Trafficking 2013-2016; Travelodge employee allegedly exploited victim's trafficked status for sex. One Pennsylvania hotel also named: Motel 6 (Arsenal Road, York).

  • National — 39 states, 115+ Red Roof Inn locations

    The Independent investigation July 2024: 115 Red Roof Inn properties across 39 states named by survivors; 42+ federal lawsuits active. Attorney Steven Babin representing close to 1,000 victims. Customer reviews mention prostitution at 176 properties. Red Roof Inn operates approximately 624 U.S. properties.

Key defendants

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

Role: Franchisor

Motion to dismiss denied in T.S. v. Wyndham (D. Minn. 2024, Doc. 63) on beneficiary liability; joint employer theory survived in T.E. v. Wyndham (S.D. Ohio 2023, Doc. 35). Named in new W.D. Wash. filing (2:25-cv-00347, Feb. 2025). Losing ground on vicarious liability theories.

G6 Hospitality, LLC

Role: Franchisor

Dismissed from K.O. v. Red Lion (E.D. Mich. 2024, Doc. 135) on statute of limitations; refiled against in Doe v. G6 Hospitality (W.D. Wash. 2:25-cv-00347, Feb. 2025). Cyclical dismissal-and-refile pattern suggests plaintiffs treating as deep pocket despite temporal exposure limits.

Marriott International, Inc.

Role: Franchisor

Dismissed from K.O. (E.D. Mich. 2024, Doc. 135); survived dismissal in J.C. v. Choice Hotels (N.D. Cal. 2020, Doc. 104) on agency theory. Mixed record on personal jurisdiction and franchisee control—exposure varies by venue.

Choice Hotels International, Inc.

Role: Franchisor

Survived dismissal in J.C. (N.D. Cal. 2020, Doc. 104) on beneficiary and agency theories; opposed MDL 2928 centralization (J.P.M.L. 2020). Consistent litigation posture: challenge personal jurisdiction, deny operational control.

Red Roof Inns, Inc.

Role: Franchisor

Active in T.E. v. Wyndham (S.D. Ohio 2023, Doc. 35) alongside Wyndham; no reported dismissal order in that case. Recurring co-defendant in multi-hotel trafficking complaints.

DefendantRoleIntelligence Note
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.FranchisorMotion to dismiss denied in T.S. v. Wyndham (D. Minn. 2024, Doc. 63) on beneficiary liability; joint employer theory survived in T.E. v. Wyndham (S.D. Ohio 2023, Doc. 35). Named in new W.D. Wash. filing (2:25-cv-00347, Feb. 2025). Losing ground on vicarious liability theories.
G6 Hospitality, LLCFranchisorDismissed from K.O. v. Red Lion (E.D. Mich. 2024, Doc. 135) on statute of limitations; refiled against in Doe v. G6 Hospitality (W.D. Wash. 2:25-cv-00347, Feb. 2025). Cyclical dismissal-and-refile pattern suggests plaintiffs treating as deep pocket despite temporal exposure limits.
Marriott International, Inc.FranchisorDismissed from K.O. (E.D. Mich. 2024, Doc. 135); survived dismissal in J.C. v. Choice Hotels (N.D. Cal. 2020, Doc. 104) on agency theory. Mixed record on personal jurisdiction and franchisee control—exposure varies by venue.
Choice Hotels International, Inc.FranchisorSurvived dismissal in J.C. (N.D. Cal. 2020, Doc. 104) on beneficiary and agency theories; opposed MDL 2928 centralization (J.P.M.L. 2020). Consistent litigation posture: challenge personal jurisdiction, deny operational control.
Red Roof Inns, Inc.FranchisorActive in T.E. v. Wyndham (S.D. Ohio 2023, Doc. 35) alongside Wyndham; no reported dismissal order in that case. Recurring co-defendant in multi-hotel trafficking complaints.

Timeline

  1. 2008

    TVPRA Civil Remedy Enacted

    Congress amends Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act to create private right of action under 18 U.S.C. § 1595 allowing victims to sue entities that knowingly benefit from sex trafficking ventures.

  2. 2020-02-05

    JPML Denies Hotel MDL Formation

    Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation denies transfer motion for In re Hotel Industry Sex Trafficking Litigation, MDL No. 2928, finding insufficient common factual questions across 21 actions involving different hotels, brands, and trafficking ventures. 433 F.Supp.3d 1353 (J.P.M.L. 2020).

  3. 2020-04-22

    Marriott Franchisee Liability Pleadings Standard Set

    E.D. Pa. denies Marriott's motion to dismiss in A.B. v. Marriott Int'l, Inc., 455 F.Supp.3d 171, holding plaintiff adequately pled franchisor liability under TVPRA by alleging corporate knowledge of trafficking indicators and failure to implement anti-trafficking policies. Civil Action No. 19-5770.

  4. 2023-11

    Red Roof Inn Settles Eve-of-Trial

    Red Roof Inn settles TVPRA claims by four women alleging trafficking at Smyrna and Buckhead locations, days before scheduled trial in N.D. Ga. Terms undisclosed.

  5. 2024-06

    Red Roof Inn Mid-Trial Settlement

    Red Roof Inn settles second Georgia TVPRA case mid-trial after plaintiffs complete evidence presentation. Eleven women alleged trafficking at same Smyrna and Buckhead properties from 2009-2018.

  6. 2024-06

    United Inn Dismissals

    Two TVPRA cases against United Inn & Suites dismissed by N.D. Ga. federal judge; plaintiffs appeal. Dismissals preceded $40M verdict in related case.

  7. 2025-07-11

    $40M Verdict Against United Inn & Suites

    Atlanta jury awards $10 million compensatory and $30 million punitive damages against United Inn & Suites in DeKalb County, first hotel TVPRA jury verdict in Georgia and largest civil trafficking award nationwide. Plaintiff trafficked at age 16. N.D. Ga.

  8. 2025-07-21

    Super 8 Trial Scheduled

    Second Georgia hotel TVPRA trial scheduled against Super 8 in Tucker involving 15-year-old trafficked in 2015, following United Inn verdict.

Statute of limitations

TVPRA claims against hotels now carry substantial verdict exposure; equitable tolling doctrine expands federal filing windows when trafficking was ongoing. State law claims may provide longer or unlimited windows in Connecticut, Delaware, and California (post-2024). Screen for federal claims first where trafficking occurred at branded hotel properties.

⚠ 1 state with critical SOL — act immediately

California

7 years from date of being freed from trafficking (adults); 10 years from age 18 (minors)

Rule: Civil Code § 52.5; no civil SOL for child sexual abuse claims arising on or after January 1, 2024

Discovery: 10 years from discovery of psychological, physical, or emotional injury caused by trafficking

Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 340.1 eliminates civil SOL for CSA claims on/after January 1, 2024

⚠Arkansas

2-year revival window: January 1, 2026 through December 31, 2027

Rule: Special revival statute for adult survivors; otherwise 3 years from incident or discovery for minors until age 21

Discovery: Clock starts from discovery of incident for minors

Revival window currently open for adult claims that would otherwise be time-barred; window closes December 31, 2027

New York

No criminal SOL for felony sex offenses; civil claims extended through discovery rule

Rule: Criminal SOL eliminated for rape and sexual abuse in 2006; civil claims benefit from discovery rule

Discovery: Discovery-based accrual for civil claims

Criminal prosecution available at any time for serious felonies; civil SOL until age 28 for child victims

Florida

No SOL if under 16 at time of incident; until age 25 if 16-17; 4 years for adults

Rule: No civil SOL for minors under 16; 10-year SOL for adult survivors for incidents on or after July 1, 2020

Age-based tiers create screening complexity; verify victim's age at time of trafficking

Connecticut

No civil statute of limitations

Rule: Complete elimination of civil SOL for sexual assault and abuse claims

Delaware

No civil statute of limitations

Rule: Complete elimination of civil SOL for sexual assault and abuse claims

Federal (TVPRA)

10 years from date of violation

Rule: 18 U.S.C. § 1595(c)(1); equitable tolling available per Doe v. Wyndham Hotels, No. 2:24-cv-204 (E.D. Va. March 6, 2025) (Walker, J.)

Discovery: Equitable tolling applies where trafficking ongoing; courts reluctant to dismiss at pleading stage

First TVPRA hotel jury verdict: $40 million against United Inn (2025); franchisor liability established

StateSOLRuleDiscovery RuleNotes
California7 years from date of being freed from trafficking (adults); 10 years from age 18 (minors)Civil Code § 52.5; no civil SOL for child sexual abuse claims arising on or after January 1, 202410 years from discovery of psychological, physical, or emotional injury caused by traffickingCal. Code Civ. Proc. § 340.1 eliminates civil SOL for CSA claims on/after January 1, 2024
⚠Arkansas2-year revival window: January 1, 2026 through December 31, 2027Special revival statute for adult survivors; otherwise 3 years from incident or discovery for minors until age 21Clock starts from discovery of incident for minorsRevival window currently open for adult claims that would otherwise be time-barred; window closes December 31, 2027
New YorkNo criminal SOL for felony sex offenses; civil claims extended through discovery ruleCriminal SOL eliminated for rape and sexual abuse in 2006; civil claims benefit from discovery ruleDiscovery-based accrual for civil claimsCriminal prosecution available at any time for serious felonies; civil SOL until age 28 for child victims
FloridaNo SOL if under 16 at time of incident; until age 25 if 16-17; 4 years for adultsNo civil SOL for minors under 16; 10-year SOL for adult survivors for incidents on or after July 1, 2020—Age-based tiers create screening complexity; verify victim's age at time of trafficking
ConnecticutNo civil statute of limitationsComplete elimination of civil SOL for sexual assault and abuse claims——
DelawareNo civil statute of limitationsComplete elimination of civil SOL for sexual assault and abuse claims——
Federal (TVPRA)10 years from date of violation18 U.S.C. § 1595(c)(1); equitable tolling available per Doe v. Wyndham Hotels, No. 2:24-cv-204 (E.D. Va. March 6, 2025) (Walker, J.)Equitable tolling applies where trafficking ongoing; courts reluctant to dismiss at pleading stageFirst TVPRA hotel jury verdict: $40 million against United Inn (2025); franchisor liability established

Live intelligence

AI litigation brief

Sex Trafficking Hotel remains active mdl with 36 current signals in the accepted feed.

Overview

MDL No. 3104 (In re: Hotel Industry Sex Trafficking Litigation (No. II)) was created January 2024 and remains active before Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley in the S.D. Ohio. The MDL succeeded after the JPML denied the first consolidation attempt (MDL 2928) in February 2020. Recent rulings continue to shape beneficiary liability theories under 18 U.S.C. §1595, with courts split on franchisor knowledge standards.

Key developments

  • PACER court filing on Apr 23: InterContinental Hotels Group Sex Trafficking Litigation
  • Msn.com news on Apr 23: DeKalb hotel ordered to pay $40 million in sex trafficking verdict - msn.com

Trajectory

Court filings and press coverage are both active in MDL 3104, pointing to sustained litigation pressure rather than a one-off headline cycle. 6 live sources are contributing current context.

Editorial intelligence

MDL 3104 should stay on the lead docket watch because it is the primary consolidation vehicle for Hotel Trafficking.

Generated Apr 28, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

36 events detected

Google News (22)

  • DeKalb hotel ordered to pay $40 million in sex trafficking verdict - msn.com

    msn.comApr 23, 2026, 12:51 PM UTC
  • Appeals court revives trafficking victims’ lawsuits against Atlanta-area hotels - 11Alive.com

    11Alive.comApr 3, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • DeKalb hotel at center of landmark sex trafficking ruling - AJC.com

    AJC.comApr 3, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • Sex Trafficking Victims Get New Chance at Hotel Liability Claims - Bloomberg Law News

    Bloomberg Law NewsMar 30, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • Lawsuit alleges SeaTac-area Motel 6 staff ignored signs of child sex trafficking - KING5.com

    KING5.comMar 23, 2026, 5:28 PM UTC
  • Lawsuit alleges SeaTac-area Motel 6 staff ignored signs of child sex trafficking - KING5.com

    KING5.comMar 23, 2026, 5:28 PM UTC
  • Liberty Mutual must pay hotel’s defense costs in sex trafficking cases - businessinsurance.com

    businessinsurance.comMar 23, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • Attorneys Announce Federal Lawsuit Against National Hotel Chain In Connection to Major Sex Trafficking Ring - EastTexasRadio.com

    EastTexasRadio.comMar 13, 2026, 10:58 AM UTC
  • Woman sues Wyndham, other hotels over alleged connection to Houston sex trafficking - Houston Public Media

    Houston Public MediaMar 12, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • Texas lawsuit accuses major hotel chains of enabling sex trafficking - cbs19.tv

    cbs19.tvMar 12, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • Woman sues Wyndham, other hotels over alleged connection to Houston sex trafficking - houstonpublicmedia.org

    houstonpublicmedia.orgMar 12, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • Texas lawsuit accuses major hotel chains of enabling sex trafficking - cbs19.tv

    cbs19.tvMar 12, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • ‘Protect our guests’: Sex trafficking victim sues Jacksonville hotel - Action News Jax

    Action News JaxMar 5, 2026, 8:00 AM UTC
  • Jax hotel faces litigation years after sex trafficking bust - The Business Journals

    The Business JournalsMar 5, 2026, 8:00 AM UTC
  • Jax hotel faces litigation years after sex trafficking bust - The Business Journals

    The Business JournalsMar 5, 2026, 8:00 AM UTC
  • ‘Protect our guests’: Sex trafficking victim sues Jacksonville hotel - Yahoo

    YahooMar 5, 2026, 8:00 AM UTC
  • Maryland hotels accused of enabling sex trafficking in lawsuit spanning 2013-16 - Baltimore Sun

    Baltimore SunFeb 23, 2026, 8:00 AM UTC
  • Maryland hotels accused of enabling sex trafficking in lawsuit spanning 2013-16 - Baltimore Sun

    Baltimore SunFeb 23, 2026, 8:00 AM UTC
  • Off-Strip resort-casino failed to prevent sex trafficking, lawsuit says - Las Vegas Review-Journal

    Las Vegas Review-JournalFeb 20, 2026, 8:00 AM UTC
  • Off-Strip resort-casino failed to prevent sex trafficking, lawsuit says - Las Vegas Review-Journal

    Las Vegas Review-JournalFeb 20, 2026, 8:00 AM UTC
  • Human Trafficking Liability Is No Longer Theoretical: TVPRA Exposure, Victim Remedies, and What Hotels Should Do Now - Foley & Lardner LLP

    Foley & Lardner LLPJan 29, 2026, 8:00 AM UTC
  • Human Trafficking Liability Is No Longer Theoretical: TVPRA Exposure, Victim Remedies, and What Hotels Should Do Now - Foley & Lardner LLP

    Foley & Lardner LLPJan 29, 2026, 8:00 AM UTC

No recent PubMed signals. Monitoring is active — this section updates automatically.

PACERILND1:26-cv-04611Apr 23, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

InterContinental Hotels Group Sex Trafficking Litigation

PACER docket entry from ILND: COMPLAINT filed by Jane Doe (K.R.D.), an Individual; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25021456. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Harris, David) (Entered: 04/23/2026)

PACEROHSD2:26-cv-00484Apr 21, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Red Roof Franchising LLC et al. Sex Trafficking Litigation

PACER docket entry from OHSD: COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-10998218), filed by JANE DOE (HT-00011). (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Barrick, Penny) (Entered: 04/21/2026)

PACEROHSD2:26-cv-00479Apr 20, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

G6 Hospitality et al. Sex Trafficking Litigation

PACER docket entry from OHSD: COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-10996978), filed by JANE DOE (HT-00009). (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Barrick, Penny) (Entered: 04/20/2026)

PACEROHSD2:26-cv-00483Apr 20, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Delta Kew Holding Corp Sex Trafficking Litigation

PACER docket entry from OHSD: COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-10997455), filed by Jane Doe (HT-00010). (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Barrick, Penny) (Entered: 04/20/2026)

PACERMND0:26-cv-02280Apr 17, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Teddy Bear Investments Sex Trafficking Litigation

PACER docket entry from MND: COMPLAINT against Teddy Bear Investments, LLP (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-12890416) filed by Jane Doe (T.M.D.). Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Rick, Anna) (Entered: 04/17/2026)

PACERCACD2:26-cv-03771Apr 9, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Salesforce Sex Trafficking Litigation

PACER docket entry from CACD: COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-41955487 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff Jane Doe (SF-00015). (Attorney Mark D Potter added to party Jane Doe (SF-00015)(pty:pla))(Potter, Mark) (Entered: 04/09/2026)

PACERCACD8:26-cv-00854Apr 8, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Dhanuba Hospitality Inc. Sex Trafficking Litigation

PACER docket entry from CACD: COMPLAINT Receipt No: BCACDC-41949319 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe. (Attorney Katie Llamas added to party Jane Doe(pty:pla))(Llamas, Katie) (Entered: 04/08/2026)

PACERMAD1:26-cv-11653Apr 8, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide Sex Trafficking Litigation

PACER docket entry from MAD: COMPLAINT against Westin Operator LLC, Westin Hotel Management L.P., Host SH Boston Corporation, Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, LLC. Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number AMADC-11665542 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Hannah R.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Category Form)(Do

PACEROHSD2:26-cv-00425Apr 8, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Choice Hotels International Sex Trafficking Litigation

PACER docket entry from OHSD: COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-10978390), filed by Jane Doe (HT-00008). (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Barrick, Penny) (Entered: 04/08/2026)

PACERCACD8:26-cv-00792Apr 1, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Purple Rain Spa Sex Trafficking Litigation

PACER docket entry from CACD: COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-41886762 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff K. L.. (Attorney Jeffrey C Toppe added to party K. L.(pty:pla))(Toppe, Jeffrey) (Entered: 04/01/2026)

Sign in to view all 14 filings

No recent legislative signals. Monitoring is active — this section updates automatically.

Workbench

Sign in to save litigations, capture notes, and monitor live signals. Sign in for unlimited.

LexGenius Ranking

70Score

Court, news, and regulatory activity are elevated

Evidence10 / 20
Momentum20 / 20
Exposure10 / 20
Regulatory10 / 20
Legal20 / 20

Monitoring

Live

monitoring

Last: Apr 28, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Next: 40:39

Source Monitoring

PACER

39s

PACER

1m 39s

Google News

39s

PubMed

Pending

Event feed

36

events detected

Google NewsPACER

AI Brief

Sex Trafficking Hotel remains active mdl with 36 current signals in the accepted feed.

Overview

MDL No. 3104 (In re: Hotel Industry Sex Trafficking Litigation (No. II)) was created January 2024 and remains active before Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley in the S.D. Ohio. The MDL succeeded after the JPML denied the first consolidation attempt (MDL 2928) in February 2020. Recent rulings continue to shape beneficiary liability theories under 18 U.S.C. §1595, with courts split on franchisor knowledge standards.

Key developments

PACER court filing on Apr 23: InterContinental Hotels Group Sex Trafficking Litigation. ‖ msn.com news on Apr 23: DeKalb hotel ordered to pay $40 million in sex trafficking verdict - msn.com.

Generated Apr 28, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Tracked MDLs

MDL 3104

S.D. Ohio

← Previous

1,4-Dioxane

Tracks contamination litigation, public-health reporting, and regulatory actions involving 1,4-dioxane exposure.

Next →

Boy Scouts

Tracks Boy Scouts abuse litigation, bankruptcy-related developments, and survivor-accountability reporting.