MDL Track
MDL 3171
N.D. Cal.
Lyft passenger sexual assault
28 pending
Transportation Safety · claims alleging Lyft failed to protect riders from sexual assault and violent incidents
Defendant
Lyft, Inc.
MDL / Track
MDL 3171
N.D. Cal.
Judge
Judge Rita F. Lin
Plaintiffs
~44 pending (28 per JPML March 2, 2026 report, plus ~16 new filings tracked since)
Bellwether / Trial
No verdicts yet
Settlement Status
No settlements in MDL
Track litigations for free. Save this matter, capture notes, and monitor live signals.
Case overview
The JPML established MDL 3171 on February 5, 2026, consolidating federal Lyft passenger sexual assault litigation before Judge Rita F. Lin in the Northern District of California. The MDL currently comprises at least 17 cases transferred from 10 district courts, with pretrial coordination underway and bellwether trials anticipated for late 2026 or early 2027. Plaintiffs allege Lyft failed to implement adequate safety measures despite knowledge of assault risks dating to 2015, asserting claims for negligence, negligent hiring/retention/supervision, common carrier negligence, and product liability design defect.
Causation Theory
Plaintiffs' causation theory centers on systemic safety failures: Lyft relies on name-based background checks via Checkr, Inc. without fingerprinting except in New York City, allowing drivers with prior complaints or criminal records to operate. In Doe A.F., 2:23-cv-03990, an unauthorized driver accessed a legitimate driver's account using a rejected applicant's phone number and operated for six months. Lyft's 2024 Safety Transparency Report documented 2,651 reports of serious sexual assault between 2020-2022, including a 26% increase in non-consensual sexual penetration attacks, following 4,158 reports from 2017-2019 in its 2021 report.
Case Management Orders
Litigation status
MDL 3171 established February 5, 2026, consolidating federal Lyft passenger sexual assault litigation before Judge Rita F. Lin in the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division. Pretrial coordination underway; bellwether trials anticipated late 2026 or early 2027. Lyft opposed consolidation citing existing California state court JCCP No. 5061, but JPML rejected argument noting it cannot compel federal plaintiffs into state court.
MDL Track
MDL 3171
N.D. Cal.
Lyft passenger sexual assault
28 pending
State Court Activity
~1,971 cases consolidated in California JCCP No. 5061 (San Francisco County Superior Court), active six years with substantial discovery completed; 1,569 cases involve out-of-state incidents
Geographic exposure
Lyft disclosed 6,809 sexual assault reports 2017-2022; no data released 2012-2017 or post-2022. Company relies on name-based background checks via Checkr, Inc. — no fingerprinting except NYC. Lyft aggressively contests untimeliness in short-SOL jurisdictions; see March 2024 N.D. Cal. motion.
1,971 cases consolidated in San Francisco County Superior Court Judicial Council Coordination Proceedings No. 5061; 1,569 involve out-of-state incidents. Substantial discovery completed over approximately six years.
Federal MDL 3171 now accepting filings; JPML heard consolidation motion January 2026. Georgia plaintiff A.T. joined January 2026 after assault September 8, 2025. Seventeen federal cases pending across ten districts as of October 2025 motion.
Driver Hamidreza Farahbakhshsadeh assaulted passenger; had prior sexual misconduct complaints but remained active on platform until arrest. Convicted January 2025, sentenced to 12 years.
March 25, 2023 incident involving driver Rafael C.; case CGC-25-623042, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, Judge Austin Lam presiding.
Plaintiff Tabatha Means, Florida resident, repeatedly raped by Lyft driver paired through app; federal complaint filed N.D. Cal. January 9, 2024, pending San Francisco Division.
August 2025 incident: driver Luis Carlos Ramos Teixeira charged with allegedly sexually assaulting female passenger.
Sole jurisdiction mandating fingerprint-based background checks for Lyft drivers. September 2019 lawsuit alleged kidnapping at gunpoint by driver with two accomplices. January 2023: driver Qandagha Raufi, 32, charged with first-degree sexual abuse, third-degree kidnapping, misdemeanor sexual misconduct for alleged assault of passenger.
Plaintiff Jane Doe A.F. assaulted August 12, 2021 in Philadelphia by driver Ntiamoah Brown; case 2:23-cv-03990, E.D. Pa., Judge Marston. Removed from state court October 2023.
Plaintiff Jane Doe assaulted March 5, 2022 in Lawrence by fraudulent driver using 'Terri Parham' account (actually Michalia Williams, convicted felon with mismatched photo); case Doe v. Lyft, Inc., 756 F.Supp.3d 1110 (D. Kan. 2024), Judge John W. Broomes. Williams pled guilty to felony theft; co-defendant Joshua Williams pled guilty to felony aggravated battery, sentenced 32 months.
Key defendants
Lyft, Inc.
Role: Transportation Network Company
Core defendant in newly established MDL before Judge Rita F. Lin in N.D. Cal. (JPML transferred 17+ cases Feb. 2026). In Means, 24-cv-00177, Judge Chesney partially denied dismissal, preserving vicarious liability and common carrier claims despite Florida TNC statute. In Jane Doe A.F., 23-cv-03990, E.D. Pa. dismissed negligent hiring for lack of pre-hire knowledge but left gross negligence and vicarious liability intact. Aggressive 12(b)(6) posture on driver classification and statutory preemption.
| Defendant | Role | Intelligence Note |
|---|---|---|
| Lyft, Inc. | Transportation Network Company | Core defendant in newly established MDL before Judge Rita F. Lin in N.D. Cal. (JPML transferred 17+ cases Feb. 2026). In Means, 24-cv-00177, Judge Chesney partially denied dismissal, preserving vicarious liability and common carrier claims despite Florida TNC statute. In Jane Doe A.F., 23-cv-03990, E.D. Pa. dismissed negligent hiring for lack of pre-hire knowledge but left gross negligence and vicarious liability intact. Aggressive 12(b)(6) posture on driver classification and statutory preemption. |
Timeline
California JCCP 5061 Established
San Francisco County Superior Court consolidates Lyft sexual assault cases into Judicial Council Coordination Proceedings No. 5061. Proceeding includes 1,971 cases with substantial discovery completed.
Means v. Lyft Federal Complaint Filed
Tabatha Means files federal complaint in N.D. Cal. (Case No. 24-cv-00177-MMC) alleging rape by Lyft driver, asserting common carrier liability and negligent hiring claims. Case cites Lyft's awareness of driver sexual assaults since 2015.
Means Motion to Dismiss Ruling
Judge Maria-Magdalena M. Cuellar grants in part and denies in part Lyft's motion to dismiss in Means v. Lyft, Inc., No. 24-cv-00177-MMC, allowing negligence and product liability claims to proceed.
Doe v. Lyft Product Liability Ruling
Judge John W. Broomes in D. Kan. (Case No. 23-2548-JWB-TJJ) denies Lyft's motion to dismiss product liability and negligence claims in 756 F.Supp.3d 1110, citing expanding platform liability theories.
MDL Motion Filed with JPML
Plaintiffs file motion to establish federal MDL for Lyft sexual assault litigation. Lyft opposes, arguing California JCCP 5061 renders federal consolidation duplicative.
JPML Hears Oral Argument
U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation hears arguments in San Diego on Lyft MDL motion. At least 17 federal cases pending across 10 district courts.
JPML Establishes MDL 3171
JPML issues transfer order establishing MDL No. 3171, In re Lyft Inc. Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation, consolidating federal cases before Judge Rita F. Lin in N.D. Cal.
MDL 3171 Assigned to Judge Lin
MDL 3171 formally assigned to U.S. District Judge Rita F. Lin, Northern District of California, San Francisco. Initial transfer includes at least 17 cases.
Lieff Cabraser Files New MDL Complaint
Lieff Cabraser files federal complaint in N.D. Cal. on behalf of Jane Doe, alleging December 2024 assault and asserting negligence, negligent hiring/retention/supervision, common carrier negligence, and product liability design defect claims.
Statute of limitations
MDL 3171 (Lyft Sexual Assault) consolidated February 5, 2026, per source [4], before N.D. Cal. Choice-of-law conflicts likely on SOL; forum defendant Lyft Inc. headquartered in CA. Federal courts will apply forum state's borrowing statutes where plaintiff resides in short-SOL jurisdiction. Screen for: (1) assault date, (2) plaintiff's residence, (3) ride location, (4) any minority tolling. Lyft aggressively contesting untimeliness — see March 2024 N.D. Cal. motion per Law360 source [5]. Exclude Uber/MDL 3084 materials; exclude derivative securities case No. 20-09257.
California
10 years from assault
Rule: Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 340.16; applies to civil sexual assault claims
Discovery: May be tolled if plaintiff did not immediately realize assault occurred
N.D. Cal. venue for MDL 3171; Lyft motion to dismiss filed March 2024 arguing untimeliness under both CA and FL law. Law360 reports Lyft urging dismissal as 'untimely' under CA law
⚠Florida
2 years from assault
Rule: Fla. Stat. § 95.11; general personal injury SOL applies to civil sexual assault claims
Discovery: Limited exceptions for minors or dependency
Plaintiffs attempting N.D. Cal. filing using CA 10-year SOL; Lyft actively challenging as untimely. Source [2] confirms FL civil sexual assault claims typically time-barred after 2 years
Colorado
No SOL for conduct post-January 1, 2022
Rule: Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-103.8; eliminated civil SOL for sexual assault claims
Retroactivity for pre-2022 claims uncertain per source [1]; confirm legacy claims separately
Maryland
No SOL for child sexual abuse claims
Rule: Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. Code Ann. § 5-117; upheld retroactively by MD high court 2025
2025 appellate validation of retroactive removal per source [1]; adult claims may differ
Maine
Child claims: previously eliminated SOL struck down for retroactive application
Rule: Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 14, § 752-C; 2025 ME high court invalidated retroactive removal for expired claims
Watch remands; constitutional challenge succeeded on retroactivity grounds per source [1]. Screen carefully for accrual date
New York
Adult: 3 years; Child: until age 55
Rule: N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 213-c (adult); § 208(g) (Child Victims Act extension)
Large plaintiff pool; CVA lookback closed August 2021. Source [4] references NY Lyft-specific counsel
| State | SOL | Rule | Discovery Rule | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| California | 10 years from assault | Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 340.16; applies to civil sexual assault claims | May be tolled if plaintiff did not immediately realize assault occurred | N.D. Cal. venue for MDL 3171; Lyft motion to dismiss filed March 2024 arguing untimeliness under both CA and FL law. Law360 reports Lyft urging dismissal as 'untimely' under CA law |
| ⚠Florida | 2 years from assault | Fla. Stat. § 95.11; general personal injury SOL applies to civil sexual assault claims | Limited exceptions for minors or dependency | Plaintiffs attempting N.D. Cal. filing using CA 10-year SOL; Lyft actively challenging as untimely. Source [2] confirms FL civil sexual assault claims typically time-barred after 2 years |
| Colorado | No SOL for conduct post-January 1, 2022 | Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-103.8; eliminated civil SOL for sexual assault claims | — | Retroactivity for pre-2022 claims uncertain per source [1]; confirm legacy claims separately |
| Maryland | No SOL for child sexual abuse claims | Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. Code Ann. § 5-117; upheld retroactively by MD high court 2025 | — | 2025 appellate validation of retroactive removal per source [1]; adult claims may differ |
| Maine | Child claims: previously eliminated SOL struck down for retroactive application | Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 14, § 752-C; 2025 ME high court invalidated retroactive removal for expired claims | — | Watch remands; constitutional challenge succeeded on retroactivity grounds per source [1]. Screen carefully for accrual date |
| New York | Adult: 3 years; Child: until age 55 | N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 213-c (adult); § 208(g) (Child Victims Act extension) | — | Large plaintiff pool; CVA lookback closed August 2021. Source [4] references NY Lyft-specific counsel |
Live intelligence
AI litigation brief
Lyft Assault remains early-stage / active mdl with 41 current signals in the accepted feed.
Overview
MDL 3171 established February 5, 2026, consolidating federal Lyft passenger sexual assault litigation before Judge Rita F. Lin in the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division. Pretrial coordination underway; bellwether trials anticipated late 2026 or early 2027. Lyft opposed consolidation citing existing California state court JCCP No. 5061, but JPML rejected argument noting it cannot compel federal plaintiffs into state court.
Key developments
Trajectory
Court filings and press coverage are both active in MDL 3171, pointing to sustained litigation pressure rather than a one-off headline cycle. 5 live sources are contributing current context.
Editorial intelligence
MDL 3171 should stay on the lead docket watch because it is the primary consolidation vehicle for Lyft Assault.
Generated Aug 12, 2026, 2:00 AM UTC
41 events detected
Google News (18)
As NC Lyft driver faces charges, attorneys point out disturbing number of rideshare assaults - CBS 17
Lyft driver accused of sexual assault in Lewiston to be returned to ICE custody - fox23maine.com
Lyft Driver Charged with Sexually Assaulting Woman in Maine - q961.com
Lyft driver accused of sexually assaulting woman in Lewiston - WGME
Maine Lyft Driver Allegedly Sexually Assaulted Intoxicated Woman - 92 Moose
Lewiston Lyft Driver Charged With Gross Sexual Assault; Court Records Show Recent Release From ICE Custody - The Maine Wire
Lyft driver charged with sexually assaulting woman in Lewiston - Sun Journal
Man arrested, accused of sexually assaulting Lyft driver in midtown Tulsa - fox23.com
Lyft Lawsuit: 18 Key Updates & Payouts (July 2026) - LawFold.com
California Regulators Voted to Release Ride-Hailing Safety Reports. Then They Didn’t. - San Francisco Public Press
Six Nebraska women legislators say federal rideshare safety proposal could jeopardize safety - KOLN | Nebraska Local News, Weather, Sports | Lincoln, NE
DWC; House Dems Urge Speaker Johnson to Remove Amendment that Shields Rideshare Companies From Liability for Sexual Assault - Democratic Women's Caucus (.gov)
Boise Lyft driver found guilty of first-degree kidnapping and rape - KBOI
A Boise-area Lyft driver was accused of rape, kidnapping. Here’s the verdict - Idaho Statesman
Lyft drivers have to complete safety training if they want to pick up passengers - Mashable
‘It’s Following Me No Matter What, So I Have to Make Meaning of It’ - The Cut
Nachawati Law Group Partner Appointed to Leadership Committee in Lyft Sexual Assault MDL - citybiz
Lyft driver gets jail time after taking nude photo of unconscious passenger - WCVB
No recent PubMed signals. Monitoring is active — this section updates automatically.
Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation
PACER docket filed in JPML: Plaintiffs are suing Defendant because they were sexually assaulted, harassed, or attacked by drivers contracted through the Lyft platform. Plaintiffs claim that the use of the Lyft rideshare service and mobile application led to severe physical and psychological trauma. They allege that Lyft failed
Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation
PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-22313117.). Filed by B. C.. (Ruzicka, Thomas) (Filed on 8/7/2026) (Entered: 08/07/2026)
Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation
PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT against Lyft, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-22305852.). Filed by C. L. E.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lang, Taylor) (Filed on 8/6/2026) (Entered: 08/06/2026)
Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation
PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT against Lyft, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-22305807.). Filed by M. A. P.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lang, Taylor) (Filed on 8/6/2026) (Entered: 08/06/2026)
Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation
PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT against Lyft, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-22305759.). Filed by D. M. M.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lang, Taylor) (Filed on 8/6/2026) (Entered: 08/06/2026)
Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation
PACER docket entry from NCWD: NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Mecklenburg Superior Court, case number 26CV029688-590. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANCWDC-7549991) filed by Lyft, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Ex. A - 2026-05-27 Complaint, # 2 Ex. B -Arnold Declaration ISO Notice of Removal, # 3 Ex. C - 26CV029688-590 Cover
Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation
PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT against Lyft, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-22272224.). Filed by K. M. S.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lang, Taylor) (Filed on 7/29/2026) (Entered: 07/29/2026)
Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation
PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT against Lyft, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-22272181.). Filed by T. L. H.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lang, Taylor) (Filed on 7/29/2026) (Entered: 07/29/2026)
Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation
PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT against Lyft, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-22271920.). Filed by R. T. S.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lang, Taylor) (Filed on 7/29/2026) (Entered: 07/29/2026)
Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation
PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-22257783.). Filed by K. B.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Grebel, David) (Filed on 7/26/2026) (Entered: 07/26/2026)
No recent legislative signals. Monitoring is active — this section updates automatically.
Workbench
Sign in to save litigations, capture notes, and monitor live signals. Sign in for unlimited.
LexGenius Ranking
73Score
Court, news, and regulatory activity are elevated
Monitoring
Live
monitoring
Last: Aug 12, 2026, 2:00 AM UTC
Next: —
Source Monitoring
PACER
PACER
Google News
PubMed
Event feed
41
events detected
AI Brief
Lyft Assault remains early-stage / active mdl with 41 current signals in the accepted feed.
Overview
MDL 3171 established February 5, 2026, consolidating federal Lyft passenger sexual assault litigation before Judge Rita F. Lin in the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division. Pretrial coordination underway; bellwether trials anticipated late 2026 or early 2027. Lyft opposed consolidation citing existing California state court JCCP No. 5061, but JPML rejected argument noting it cannot compel federal plaintiffs into state court.
Key developments
PACER court filing on Dec 31: Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation. ‖ CBS 17 news on Aug 10: As NC Lyft driver faces charges, attorneys point out disturbing number of rideshare assaults - CBS 17.
Generated Aug 12, 2026, 2:00 AM UTC
Tracked MDLs
MDL 3171
N.D. Cal.
Lyft passenger sexual assault