Abbott SCSPENDING
Nevro SCSPENDING
Cyclosporiasis OutbreakPENDING
Dupixent CTCLNEW MDL
Boston Sci. SCSNEW MDL
AI Chatbot Harm
NEWMONITOR
Roundup
ACTIVE
AFFF
ACTIVE
Depo-Provera
QUIET
Talc
QUIET
PFAS
ACTIVE
NEC Formula
ACTIVE
Bard Hernia Mesh
QUIET
Covidien Hernia Mesh
ACTIVE
Camp Lejeune
ACTIVE
Paraquat
ACTIVE
Social Media
ACTIVE
PowerPort
ACTIVE
AngioDynamics Port
ACTIVE
EtO Sterilization
ACTIVE
Hair Relaxer
ACTIVE
Paragard
ACTIVE
Suboxone Teeth
ACTIVE
Uber Assault
ACTIVE
Lyft Assault
ACTIVE
Ozempic Gastroparesis
ACTIVE
Ozempic NAION
MONITOR
Church Abuse
ACTIVE
1,4-Dioxane
MONITOR
Hotel Trafficking
ACTIVE
Boy Scouts
QUIET
LDS Abuse
ACTIVE
Keytruda
ACTIVE
Tylenol
ACTIVE
Assembly of God
ACTIVE
Video Game Addiction
ACTIVE
CA Women's Prisons
ACTIVE
Zantac
ACTIVE
ByHeart Formula
MONITOR
Cartiva
MONITOR
Roblox
ACTIVE
Sports Betting
MONITOR
Baby Food Metals
QUIET
Benzene Litigation
ACTIVE
Discord Abuse
ACTIVE
Social Media Sextortion
MONITOR
UPF Litigation
MONITOR
47Tracked
28Active
3Pending
Navigation
Abbott SCSPENDING
Nevro SCSPENDING
Cyclosporiasis OutbreakPENDING
Dupixent CTCLNEW MDL
Boston Sci. SCSNEW MDL
AI Chatbot Harm
NEWMONITOR
Roundup
ACTIVE
AFFF
ACTIVE
Depo-Provera
QUIET
Talc
QUIET
PFAS
ACTIVE
NEC Formula
ACTIVE
Bard Hernia Mesh
QUIET
Covidien Hernia Mesh
ACTIVE
Camp Lejeune
ACTIVE
Paraquat
ACTIVE
Social Media
ACTIVE
PowerPort
ACTIVE
AngioDynamics Port
ACTIVE
EtO Sterilization
ACTIVE
Hair Relaxer
ACTIVE
Paragard
ACTIVE
Suboxone Teeth
ACTIVE
Uber Assault
ACTIVE
Lyft Assault
ACTIVE
Ozempic Gastroparesis
ACTIVE
Ozempic NAION
MONITOR
Church Abuse
ACTIVE
1,4-Dioxane
MONITOR
Hotel Trafficking
ACTIVE
Boy Scouts
QUIET
LDS Abuse
ACTIVE
Keytruda
ACTIVE
Tylenol
ACTIVE
Assembly of God
ACTIVE
Video Game Addiction
ACTIVE
CA Women's Prisons
ACTIVE
Zantac
ACTIVE
ByHeart Formula
MONITOR
Cartiva
MONITOR
Roblox
ACTIVE
Sports Betting
MONITOR
Baby Food Metals
QUIET
Benzene Litigation
ACTIVE
Discord Abuse
ACTIVE
Social Media Sextortion
MONITOR
UPF Litigation
MONITOR
47Tracked
28Active
3Pending
LexGenius Logo
LexGeniusYour Edge in Mass Litigation
PricingDaily DocketTrack litigations freeSign in
LexGenius

LexGenius

Your Edge in Mass Litigation

DisclaimerAcceptable UseTermsPrivacyCookie PolicySupport

© 2026 LexGenius. All rights reserved.

Early-stage / Active MDL41 eventsNegligence / Survivor Litigation

Lyft Assault

Transportation Safety · claims alleging Lyft failed to protect riders from sexual assault and violent incidents

Defendant

Lyft, Inc.

MDL / Track

MDL 3171

N.D. Cal.

Judge

Judge Rita F. Lin

Plaintiffs

~44 pending (28 per JPML March 2, 2026 report, plus ~16 new filings tracked since)

Bellwether / Trial

No verdicts yet

Settlement Status

No settlements in MDL

Home/Torts/Lyft Assault
SharePost on XShare on BlueskyShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookEmail

Track litigations for free. Save this matter, capture notes, and monitor live signals.

Sign in
← Torts Case overview Litigation status Geographic exposure Key defendants Timeline Statute of limitations Live activity News PubMed Court filings Legislative

Case overview

The JPML established MDL 3171 on February 5, 2026, consolidating federal Lyft passenger sexual assault litigation before Judge Rita F. Lin in the Northern District of California. The MDL currently comprises at least 17 cases transferred from 10 district courts, with pretrial coordination underway and bellwether trials anticipated for late 2026 or early 2027. Plaintiffs allege Lyft failed to implement adequate safety measures despite knowledge of assault risks dating to 2015, asserting claims for negligence, negligent hiring/retention/supervision, common carrier negligence, and product liability design defect.

Causation Theory

Plaintiffs' causation theory centers on systemic safety failures: Lyft relies on name-based background checks via Checkr, Inc. without fingerprinting except in New York City, allowing drivers with prior complaints or criminal records to operate. In Doe A.F., 2:23-cv-03990, an unauthorized driver accessed a legitimate driver's account using a rejected applicant's phone number and operated for six months. Lyft's 2024 Safety Transparency Report documented 2,651 reports of serious sexual assault between 2020-2022, including a 26% increase in non-consensual sexual penetration attacks, following 4,158 reports from 2017-2019 in its 2021 report.

Case Management Orders

Litigation status

MDL 3171 established February 5, 2026, consolidating federal Lyft passenger sexual assault litigation before Judge Rita F. Lin in the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division. Pretrial coordination underway; bellwether trials anticipated late 2026 or early 2027. Lyft opposed consolidation citing existing California state court JCCP No. 5061, but JPML rejected argument noting it cannot compel federal plaintiffs into state court.

MDL Track

MDL 3171

N.D. Cal.

Lyft passenger sexual assault

28 pending

State Court Activity

~1,971 cases consolidated in California JCCP No. 5061 (San Francisco County Superior Court), active six years with substantial discovery completed; 1,569 cases involve out-of-state incidents

Geographic exposure

Lyft disclosed 6,809 sexual assault reports 2017-2022; no data released 2012-2017 or post-2022. Company relies on name-based background checks via Checkr, Inc. — no fingerprinting except NYC. Lyft aggressively contests untimeliness in short-SOL jurisdictions; see March 2024 N.D. Cal. motion.

  • California (JCCP No. 5061)

    1,971 cases consolidated in San Francisco County Superior Court Judicial Council Coordination Proceedings No. 5061; 1,569 involve out-of-state incidents. Substantial discovery completed over approximately six years.

  • Northern District of California (MDL 3171)

    Federal MDL 3171 now accepting filings; JPML heard consolidation motion January 2026. Georgia plaintiff A.T. joined January 2026 after assault September 8, 2025. Seventeen federal cases pending across ten districts as of October 2025 motion.

  • Dallas, Texas

    Driver Hamidreza Farahbakhshsadeh assaulted passenger; had prior sexual misconduct complaints but remained active on platform until arrest. Convicted January 2025, sentenced to 12 years.

  • San Antonio, Texas

    March 25, 2023 incident involving driver Rafael C.; case CGC-25-623042, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, Judge Austin Lam presiding.

  • Florida

    Plaintiff Tabatha Means, Florida resident, repeatedly raped by Lyft driver paired through app; federal complaint filed N.D. Cal. January 9, 2024, pending San Francisco Division.

  • Somerville, Massachusetts

    August 2025 incident: driver Luis Carlos Ramos Teixeira charged with allegedly sexually assaulting female passenger.

  • New York

    Sole jurisdiction mandating fingerprint-based background checks for Lyft drivers. September 2019 lawsuit alleged kidnapping at gunpoint by driver with two accomplices. January 2023: driver Qandagha Raufi, 32, charged with first-degree sexual abuse, third-degree kidnapping, misdemeanor sexual misconduct for alleged assault of passenger.

  • Pennsylvania

    Plaintiff Jane Doe A.F. assaulted August 12, 2021 in Philadelphia by driver Ntiamoah Brown; case 2:23-cv-03990, E.D. Pa., Judge Marston. Removed from state court October 2023.

  • Kansas

    Plaintiff Jane Doe assaulted March 5, 2022 in Lawrence by fraudulent driver using 'Terri Parham' account (actually Michalia Williams, convicted felon with mismatched photo); case Doe v. Lyft, Inc., 756 F.Supp.3d 1110 (D. Kan. 2024), Judge John W. Broomes. Williams pled guilty to felony theft; co-defendant Joshua Williams pled guilty to felony aggravated battery, sentenced 32 months.

Key defendants

Lyft, Inc.

Role: Transportation Network Company

Core defendant in newly established MDL before Judge Rita F. Lin in N.D. Cal. (JPML transferred 17+ cases Feb. 2026). In Means, 24-cv-00177, Judge Chesney partially denied dismissal, preserving vicarious liability and common carrier claims despite Florida TNC statute. In Jane Doe A.F., 23-cv-03990, E.D. Pa. dismissed negligent hiring for lack of pre-hire knowledge but left gross negligence and vicarious liability intact. Aggressive 12(b)(6) posture on driver classification and statutory preemption.

DefendantRoleIntelligence Note
Lyft, Inc.Transportation Network CompanyCore defendant in newly established MDL before Judge Rita F. Lin in N.D. Cal. (JPML transferred 17+ cases Feb. 2026). In Means, 24-cv-00177, Judge Chesney partially denied dismissal, preserving vicarious liability and common carrier claims despite Florida TNC statute. In Jane Doe A.F., 23-cv-03990, E.D. Pa. dismissed negligent hiring for lack of pre-hire knowledge but left gross negligence and vicarious liability intact. Aggressive 12(b)(6) posture on driver classification and statutory preemption.

Timeline

  1. 2020-01

    California JCCP 5061 Established

    San Francisco County Superior Court consolidates Lyft sexual assault cases into Judicial Council Coordination Proceedings No. 5061. Proceeding includes 1,971 cases with substantial discovery completed.

  2. 2024-01

    Means v. Lyft Federal Complaint Filed

    Tabatha Means files federal complaint in N.D. Cal. (Case No. 24-cv-00177-MMC) alleging rape by Lyft driver, asserting common carrier liability and negligent hiring claims. Case cites Lyft's awareness of driver sexual assaults since 2015.

  3. 2024-06-13

    Means Motion to Dismiss Ruling

    Judge Maria-Magdalena M. Cuellar grants in part and denies in part Lyft's motion to dismiss in Means v. Lyft, Inc., No. 24-cv-00177-MMC, allowing negligence and product liability claims to proceed.

  4. 2024-11-01

    Doe v. Lyft Product Liability Ruling

    Judge John W. Broomes in D. Kan. (Case No. 23-2548-JWB-TJJ) denies Lyft's motion to dismiss product liability and negligence claims in 756 F.Supp.3d 1110, citing expanding platform liability theories.

  5. 2025-10

    MDL Motion Filed with JPML

    Plaintiffs file motion to establish federal MDL for Lyft sexual assault litigation. Lyft opposes, arguing California JCCP 5061 renders federal consolidation duplicative.

  6. 2026-01-29

    JPML Hears Oral Argument

    U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation hears arguments in San Diego on Lyft MDL motion. At least 17 federal cases pending across 10 district courts.

  7. 2026-02-05

    JPML Establishes MDL 3171

    JPML issues transfer order establishing MDL No. 3171, In re Lyft Inc. Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation, consolidating federal cases before Judge Rita F. Lin in N.D. Cal.

  8. 2026-02-06

    MDL 3171 Assigned to Judge Lin

    MDL 3171 formally assigned to U.S. District Judge Rita F. Lin, Northern District of California, San Francisco. Initial transfer includes at least 17 cases.

  9. 2026-03-13

    Lieff Cabraser Files New MDL Complaint

    Lieff Cabraser files federal complaint in N.D. Cal. on behalf of Jane Doe, alleging December 2024 assault and asserting negligence, negligent hiring/retention/supervision, common carrier negligence, and product liability design defect claims.

Statute of limitations

MDL 3171 (Lyft Sexual Assault) consolidated February 5, 2026, per source [4], before N.D. Cal. Choice-of-law conflicts likely on SOL; forum defendant Lyft Inc. headquartered in CA. Federal courts will apply forum state's borrowing statutes where plaintiff resides in short-SOL jurisdiction. Screen for: (1) assault date, (2) plaintiff's residence, (3) ride location, (4) any minority tolling. Lyft aggressively contesting untimeliness — see March 2024 N.D. Cal. motion per Law360 source [5]. Exclude Uber/MDL 3084 materials; exclude derivative securities case No. 20-09257.

⚠ 1 state with critical SOL — act immediately

California

10 years from assault

Rule: Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 340.16; applies to civil sexual assault claims

Discovery: May be tolled if plaintiff did not immediately realize assault occurred

N.D. Cal. venue for MDL 3171; Lyft motion to dismiss filed March 2024 arguing untimeliness under both CA and FL law. Law360 reports Lyft urging dismissal as 'untimely' under CA law

⚠Florida

2 years from assault

Rule: Fla. Stat. § 95.11; general personal injury SOL applies to civil sexual assault claims

Discovery: Limited exceptions for minors or dependency

Plaintiffs attempting N.D. Cal. filing using CA 10-year SOL; Lyft actively challenging as untimely. Source [2] confirms FL civil sexual assault claims typically time-barred after 2 years

Colorado

No SOL for conduct post-January 1, 2022

Rule: Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-103.8; eliminated civil SOL for sexual assault claims

Retroactivity for pre-2022 claims uncertain per source [1]; confirm legacy claims separately

Maryland

No SOL for child sexual abuse claims

Rule: Md. Cts. & Jud. Proc. Code Ann. § 5-117; upheld retroactively by MD high court 2025

2025 appellate validation of retroactive removal per source [1]; adult claims may differ

Maine

Child claims: previously eliminated SOL struck down for retroactive application

Rule: Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 14, § 752-C; 2025 ME high court invalidated retroactive removal for expired claims

Watch remands; constitutional challenge succeeded on retroactivity grounds per source [1]. Screen carefully for accrual date

New York

Adult: 3 years; Child: until age 55

Rule: N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 213-c (adult); § 208(g) (Child Victims Act extension)

Large plaintiff pool; CVA lookback closed August 2021. Source [4] references NY Lyft-specific counsel

StateSOLRuleDiscovery RuleNotes
California10 years from assaultCal. Code Civ. Proc. § 340.16; applies to civil sexual assault claimsMay be tolled if plaintiff did not immediately realize assault occurredN.D. Cal. venue for MDL 3171; Lyft motion to dismiss filed March 2024 arguing untimeliness under both CA and FL law. Law360 reports Lyft urging dismissal as 'untimely' under CA law
⚠Florida2 years from assaultFla. Stat. § 95.11; general personal injury SOL applies to civil sexual assault claimsLimited exceptions for minors or dependencyPlaintiffs attempting N.D. Cal. filing using CA 10-year SOL; Lyft actively challenging as untimely. Source [2] confirms FL civil sexual assault claims typically time-barred after 2 years
ColoradoNo SOL for conduct post-January 1, 2022Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-103.8; eliminated civil SOL for sexual assault claims—Retroactivity for pre-2022 claims uncertain per source [1]; confirm legacy claims separately
MarylandNo SOL for child sexual abuse claimsMd. Cts. & Jud. Proc. Code Ann. § 5-117; upheld retroactively by MD high court 2025—2025 appellate validation of retroactive removal per source [1]; adult claims may differ
MaineChild claims: previously eliminated SOL struck down for retroactive applicationMe. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 14, § 752-C; 2025 ME high court invalidated retroactive removal for expired claims—Watch remands; constitutional challenge succeeded on retroactivity grounds per source [1]. Screen carefully for accrual date
New YorkAdult: 3 years; Child: until age 55N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 213-c (adult); § 208(g) (Child Victims Act extension)—Large plaintiff pool; CVA lookback closed August 2021. Source [4] references NY Lyft-specific counsel

Live intelligence

AI litigation brief

Lyft Assault remains early-stage / active mdl with 41 current signals in the accepted feed.

Overview

MDL 3171 established February 5, 2026, consolidating federal Lyft passenger sexual assault litigation before Judge Rita F. Lin in the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division. Pretrial coordination underway; bellwether trials anticipated late 2026 or early 2027. Lyft opposed consolidation citing existing California state court JCCP No. 5061, but JPML rejected argument noting it cannot compel federal plaintiffs into state court.

Key developments

  • PACER court filing on Dec 31: Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation
  • CBS 17 news on Aug 10: As NC Lyft driver faces charges, attorneys point out disturbing number of rideshare assaults - CBS 17

Trajectory

Court filings and press coverage are both active in MDL 3171, pointing to sustained litigation pressure rather than a one-off headline cycle. 5 live sources are contributing current context.

Editorial intelligence

MDL 3171 should stay on the lead docket watch because it is the primary consolidation vehicle for Lyft Assault.

Generated Aug 12, 2026, 2:00 AM UTC

41 events detected

Google News (18)

  • As NC Lyft driver faces charges, attorneys point out disturbing number of rideshare assaults - CBS 17

    CBS 17Aug 10, 2026, 9:38 PM UTC
  • Lyft driver accused of sexual assault in Lewiston to be returned to ICE custody - fox23maine.com

    fox23maine.comAug 10, 2026, 11:59 AM UTC
  • Lyft Driver Charged with Sexually Assaulting Woman in Maine - q961.com

    q961.comAug 8, 2026, 12:31 PM UTC
  • Lyft driver accused of sexually assaulting woman in Lewiston - WGME

    WGMEAug 7, 2026, 11:35 PM UTC
  • Maine Lyft Driver Allegedly Sexually Assaulted Intoxicated Woman - 92 Moose

    92 MooseAug 7, 2026, 12:07 PM UTC
  • Lewiston Lyft Driver Charged With Gross Sexual Assault; Court Records Show Recent Release From ICE Custody - The Maine Wire

    The Maine WireAug 6, 2026, 3:34 PM UTC
  • Lyft driver charged with sexually assaulting woman in Lewiston - Sun Journal

    Sun JournalAug 5, 2026, 8:27 PM UTC
  • Man arrested, accused of sexually assaulting Lyft driver in midtown Tulsa - fox23.com

    fox23.comJul 30, 2026, 3:15 PM UTC
  • Lyft Lawsuit: 18 Key Updates & Payouts (July 2026) - LawFold.com

    LawFold.comJul 18, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • California Regulators Voted to Release Ride-Hailing Safety Reports. Then They Didn’t. - San Francisco Public Press

    San Francisco Public PressJun 22, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • Six Nebraska women legislators say federal rideshare safety proposal could jeopardize safety - KOLN | Nebraska Local News, Weather, Sports | Lincoln, NE

    KOLN | Nebraska Local News, Weather, Sports | Lincoln, NEJun 18, 2026, 8:59 PM UTC
  • DWC; House Dems Urge Speaker Johnson to Remove Amendment that Shields Rideshare Companies From Liability for Sexual Assault - Democratic Women's Caucus (.gov)

    Democratic Women's Caucus (.gov)Jun 10, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • Boise Lyft driver found guilty of first-degree kidnapping and rape - KBOI

    KBOIJun 8, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • A Boise-area Lyft driver was accused of rape, kidnapping. Here’s the verdict - Idaho Statesman

    Idaho StatesmanJun 8, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • Lyft drivers have to complete safety training if they want to pick up passengers - Mashable

    MashableMay 29, 2026, 10:00 PM UTC
  • ‘It’s Following Me No Matter What, So I Have to Make Meaning of It’ - The Cut

    The CutMay 27, 2026, 1:30 PM UTC
  • Nachawati Law Group Partner Appointed to Leadership Committee in Lyft Sexual Assault MDL - citybiz

    citybizMay 22, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • Lyft driver gets jail time after taking nude photo of unconscious passenger - WCVB

    WCVBMay 19, 2026, 11:30 PM UTC

No recent PubMed signals. Monitoring is active — this section updates automatically.

PACERJPMLmdl-3171-stubDec 31, 2099, 12:00 AM UTC

Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation

PACER docket filed in JPML: Plaintiffs are suing Defendant because they were sexually assaulted, harassed, or attacked by drivers contracted through the Lyft platform. Plaintiffs claim that the use of the Lyft rideshare service and mobile application led to severe physical and psychological trauma. They allege that Lyft failed

PACERCAND3:26-cv-08237Aug 7, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation

PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-22313117.). Filed by B. C.. (Ruzicka, Thomas) (Filed on 8/7/2026) (Entered: 08/07/2026)

PACERCAND3:26-cv-08184Aug 6, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation

PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT against Lyft, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-22305852.). Filed by C. L. E.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lang, Taylor) (Filed on 8/6/2026) (Entered: 08/06/2026)

PACERCAND3:26-cv-08183Aug 6, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation

PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT against Lyft, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-22305807.). Filed by M. A. P.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lang, Taylor) (Filed on 8/6/2026) (Entered: 08/06/2026)

PACERCAND3:26-cv-08181Aug 6, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation

PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT against Lyft, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-22305759.). Filed by D. M. M.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lang, Taylor) (Filed on 8/6/2026) (Entered: 08/06/2026)

PACERNCWD3:26-cv-00630Aug 5, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation

PACER docket entry from NCWD: NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Mecklenburg Superior Court, case number 26CV029688-590. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANCWDC-7549991) filed by Lyft, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Ex. A - 2026-05-27 Complaint, # 2 Ex. B -Arnold Declaration ISO Notice of Removal, # 3 Ex. C - 26CV029688-590 Cover

PACERCAND3:26-cv-07882Jul 29, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation

PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT against Lyft, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-22272224.). Filed by K. M. S.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lang, Taylor) (Filed on 7/29/2026) (Entered: 07/29/2026)

PACERCAND3:26-cv-07881Jul 29, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation

PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT against Lyft, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-22272181.). Filed by T. L. H.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lang, Taylor) (Filed on 7/29/2026) (Entered: 07/29/2026)

PACERCAND3:26-cv-07880Jul 29, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation

PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT against Lyft, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-22271920.). Filed by R. T. S.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lang, Taylor) (Filed on 7/29/2026) (Entered: 07/29/2026)

PACERCAND3:26-cv-07737Jul 26, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation

PACER docket entry from CAND: COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-22257783.). Filed by K. B.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Grebel, David) (Filed on 7/26/2026) (Entered: 07/26/2026)

Sign in to view all 23 filings

No recent legislative signals. Monitoring is active — this section updates automatically.

Workbench

Sign in to save litigations, capture notes, and monitor live signals. Sign in for unlimited.

LexGenius Ranking

73Score

Court, news, and regulatory activity are elevated

Evidence11 / 20
Momentum20 / 20
Exposure12 / 20
Regulatory11 / 20
Legal20 / 20

Monitoring

Live

monitoring

Last: Aug 12, 2026, 2:00 AM UTC

Next: —

Source Monitoring

PACER

1m 25s

PACER

2m 25s

Google News

1m 25s

PubMed

Pending

Event feed

41

events detected

Google NewsPACER

AI Brief

Lyft Assault remains early-stage / active mdl with 41 current signals in the accepted feed.

Overview

MDL 3171 established February 5, 2026, consolidating federal Lyft passenger sexual assault litigation before Judge Rita F. Lin in the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division. Pretrial coordination underway; bellwether trials anticipated late 2026 or early 2027. Lyft opposed consolidation citing existing California state court JCCP No. 5061, but JPML rejected argument noting it cannot compel federal plaintiffs into state court.

Key developments

PACER court filing on Dec 31: Lyft Passenger Sex Assault Litigation. ‖ CBS 17 news on Aug 10: As NC Lyft driver faces charges, attorneys point out disturbing number of rideshare assaults - CBS 17.

Generated Aug 12, 2026, 2:00 AM UTC

Tracked MDLs

MDL 3171

N.D. Cal.

Lyft passenger sexual assault

← Previous

Uber Assault

Monitors Uber passenger-assault litigation, safety-policy responses, and public reporting involving Uber.

Next →

Ozempic Gastroparesis

Tracks Ozempic gastroparesis and gastrointestinal injury litigation tied to semaglutide products.