MDL Track
MDL 2974
N.D. Ga.
Paragard IUD products liability
3,926 pending
Medical Device · claims that copper IUD arms fractured during removal and caused complications
Defendant
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
MDL / Track
MDL 2974
N.D. Ga.
Judge
Judge Leigh Martin May
Plaintiffs
roughly 3,984 pending (3,926 per JPML March 2, 2026 report, plus 58 new filings tracked since)
Bellwether / Trial
Settlement Status
Track litigations for free. Save this matter, capture notes, and monitor live signals.
Case overview
The Paragard IUD MDL 2974 remains active in the Northern District of Georgia before Judge Leigh Martin May with approximately 4,000 cases pending as of mid-2026. Teva Pharmaceuticals secured a complete defense verdict in the first bellwether trial, Rickard v. Teva Pharmaceuticals and CooperSurgical, on February 4, 2026, with the jury rejecting failure-to-warn and defective-design claims. A second bellwether trial is scheduled for September 28, 2026, with no global settlement reached.
Causation Theory
Plaintiffs allege the Paragard's polyethylene plastic arms become brittle during the device's implantation period, causing them to fracture rather than flex during standard string-pull removal. A 2023 FDA review estimated breakage frequency at 0.08% to 0.15% but noted methodological limitations and lack of robust design testing due to the device's 1984 origin. A 2023 study by Nguyen et al. analyzing FDA Adverse Event Reporting System data found 4,144 copper IUD breakage reports versus 2,140 hormonal IUD reports from 1998-2022, with mechanical testing by Creinin et al. suggesting copper IUD frame design concentrates stress at arm-stem joints compared to hormonal alternatives.
Case Management Orders
Litigation status
MDL 2974 remains in active bellwether posture before Judge Leigh Martin May in the N.D. Georgia. The second federal bellwether trial, originally set for September 28, 2026, has been rescheduled to April 12, 2027 per Teva's SEC disclosure and a July 2026 court order. A third bellwether trial is stayed pending resolution of an interlocutory appeal on federal preemption issues. Case management orders governing Plaintiff Fact Sheets, Defendant Fact Sheets, and Short Form Complaints remain in effect.
MDL Track
MDL 2974
N.D. Ga.
Paragard IUD products liability
3,926 pending
State Court Activity
New Jersey state court case scheduled for trial Sept. 14, 2026 (separate from federal MDL)
MDL 2974 Leadership
Plaintiff Leadership
Co-Lead Counsel
Liaison Counsel
Geographic exposure
Approximately 3,595-3,926 cases pending in MDL 2974 as of mid-2026. FDA data: over 7,000 adverse event reports of Paragard breakage, nearly 6,000 classified serious, with 1,231 breakage reports in 2023 alone—highest annual total recorded. No global settlement; litigation in post-first-bellwether phase with defense verdict in Rickard v. Teva Pharmaceuticals and CooperSurgical (N.D. Ga.). State SOL windows vary 2-6 years per source guidance; intake teams must prioritize SOL screening as MDL age exceeds typical product liability limitations periods in majority of states.
MDL 2974, In re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation, presided over by Judge Leigh Martin May. Approximately 3,595 cases pending as of April 2026 per Halstonberg; other source cites approximately 3,926 cases. First bellwether trial (Rickard v. Teva Pharmaceuticals and CooperSurgical) ended in defense verdict February 2026; second bellwether rescheduled for fall 2026. Active discovery continues. Direct filing order permits cases to be filed directly into MDL.
CooperSurgical Paragard manufacturing plant site of repeated FDA inspections. 2022 FDA inspection faulted manufacturer for failing to 'adequately investigate breakage complaints' and failing to 'implement adequate corrective action and preventive action plans' (CAPAs). 2024 reinspection found 11 of 11 CAPAs still deficient per Spotlight on America. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System shows 1,231 breakage reports in 2023, highest single-year total on record; over 7,000 total complaints with nearly 6,000 classified as serious.
State with 2-year statute of limitations for product liability claims per general source guidance. SOL window narrowing for injuries discovered before 2024. Discovery rule may extend filing window for breakage cases discovered after initial injury event.
State with 2-year statute of limitations for product liability per general source guidance. SOL gatekeeping increasingly critical for new intakes as MDL matures.
4-year statute of limitations for product liability claims per general source guidance provides comparatively wider intake window.
3-year statute of limitations for product liability per general source guidance. Proximity to manufacturing plant and FDA inspection site. Discovery rule applicable; breakage cases with delayed fragment discovery may retain viable claims.
2-year statute of limitations with discovery rule per general source guidance. Cases require immediate SOL analysis for breakage events occurring 2022 or earlier.
2-year statute of limitations per general source guidance. SOL compression active for plaintiffs with breakage events predating 2024.
Key defendants
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Role: Manufacturer
Core defendant in MDL 2974. Filed motion to dismiss 236 time-barred cases Sept. 2024; actively contesting statute of limitations/repose. Parent Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. disclosed July 2023.
CooperSurgical, Inc.
Role: Manufacturer
Co-defendant with Teva. Joined dismissal motion targeting stale claims. Corporate parent The Cooper Companies, Inc. disclosed. Withdrawal of opposition to CTO-58 filed Aug. 2023.
Teva Women's Health, LLC
Role: Manufacturer
Named in master complaint; successor to Teva Women's Health, Inc. (terminated from docket April 2021). Active in bellwether discovery per Oct. 2024 orders.
| Defendant | Role | Intelligence Note |
|---|---|---|
| Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. | Manufacturer | Core defendant in MDL 2974. Filed motion to dismiss 236 time-barred cases Sept. 2024; actively contesting statute of limitations/repose. Parent Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. disclosed July 2023. |
| CooperSurgical, Inc. | Manufacturer | Co-defendant with Teva. Joined dismissal motion targeting stale claims. Corporate parent The Cooper Companies, Inc. disclosed. Withdrawal of opposition to CTO-58 filed Aug. 2023. |
| Teva Women's Health, LLC | Manufacturer | Named in master complaint; successor to Teva Women's Health, Inc. (terminated from docket April 2021). Active in bellwether discovery per Oct. 2024 orders. |
Timeline
Second Bellwether Trial Begins
Second bellwether trial in MDL 2974 begins September 28, 2026, before Judge Leigh Martin May in the Northern District of Georgia. Third bellwether stayed pending Eleventh Circuit interlocutory appeal on federal preemption.
MDL Reaches 4,156 Pending Cases
MDL 2974 docket reaches 4,156 pending lawsuits as of August 3, 2026, per court records.
Eleventh Circuit Grants Preemption Appeal
Eleventh Circuit grants Teva's interlocutory appeal on federal preemption question. Broader litigation stayed after next bellwether concludes pending appeal outcome.
First Bellwether Ends in Defense Verdict
Jury returns complete defense verdict for Teva in Rickard v. Teva Pharmaceuticals after two-week trial in Atlanta. All claims rejected: strict liability failure to warn, negligent failure to warn, defective design, negligent design, negligent misrepresentation, and fraudulent omission. No damages reached.
First Bellwether Trial Proceeds
Rickard v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, first MDL 2974 bellwether, begins January 20, 2026. Teva's emergency appeal to delay trial denied.
Bellwether Trial Order Finalized
Judge Leigh Martin May finalizes bellwether trial order in MDL 2974, setting three test trials for early 2026.
FDA Initiates IUD Breakage Safety Review
FDA launches safety review of IUD breakage after adverse event report volume reaches threshold requiring agency action. Review results in updated Paragard labeling; no recall issued.
JPML Creates MDL 2974
Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidates 55 actions from 31 districts into MDL No. 2974, In re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation, assigned to Judge Leigh Martin May in the Northern District of Georgia.
CooperSurgical Acquires Paragard
Teva Pharmaceuticals sells Paragard to CooperSurgical, a subsidiary of The Cooper Companies, for $1.1 billion.
Statute of limitations
MDL 2974 (In re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation), Judge Leigh Martin May, N.D. Ga. Defendants' Sept. 12, 2024 motion seeks dismissal of 236 cases across 11 states, arguing accrual at device fracture/removal—not subsequent injury discovery. First bellwether trial reset to Jan. 20, 2026 per sources. Intake must prioritize: (1) exact removal/fracture date over symptom onset; (2) state of filing vs. state of injury. No global settlement per sources; individual case viability increasingly SOL-dependent.
⚠Alabama
2 years from injury
Rule: Accrual tied to removal surgery date per defendants' Sept. 2024 motion; discovery rule disputed
Discovery: Defendants arguing clock starts at fracture/removal, not later discovery of injury
Among 11 states in Sept. 12, 2024 MDL 2974 dismissal motion targeting 236 cases; motion status unclear from sources
⚠Michigan
3 years from injury
Rule: Product liability claims; defendants arguing device fracture constitutes injury triggering accrual
Discovery: Statutory discovery rule exists but actively contested in MDL
Targeted in Sept. 2024 MDL dismissal motion; intake must screen for removal/fracture date
⚠New York
3 years from injury
Rule: Courts apply discovery rule but defendants challenging in MDL 2974
Discovery: Under active litigation; defendants asserting fracture date controls
Included in 236-case dismissal motion; risk of dismissal if filed more than 3 years post-removal/fracture
⚠Texas
2 years from injury
Rule: Product liability accrual at injury occurrence; defendants arguing strict accrual at fracture/removal
Discovery: Defendants pressing removal-date accrual in pending motion
Among 11 states in Sept. 2024 MDL dismissal motion; 2-year window creates elevated urgency
⚠Tennessee
1 year from injury
Rule: Shortest SOL among active MDL states; defendants pressing removal-date accrual
Discovery: Minimal; statutory discovery provision contested
1-year SOL plus inclusion in dismissal motion creates highest intake risk; cases likely time-barred if removal >1 year ago
⚠North Carolina
3 years from injury
Rule: Product liability with discovery rule; defendants arguing fracture date triggers accrual
Discovery: Contested in MDL 2974
Targeted in Sept. 2024 dismissal motion; screen for removal/fracture date
⚠Georgia
2 years from injury
Rule: MDL venue state with active SOL challenges; defendants asserting removal surgery date controls
Discovery: Discovery rule disputed in pending motion
MDL 2974 situs (N.D. Ga., Judge Leigh Martin May); dismissal motion includes Georgia cases
| State | SOL | Rule | Discovery Rule | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚠Alabama | 2 years from injury | Accrual tied to removal surgery date per defendants' Sept. 2024 motion; discovery rule disputed | Defendants arguing clock starts at fracture/removal, not later discovery of injury | Among 11 states in Sept. 12, 2024 MDL 2974 dismissal motion targeting 236 cases; motion status unclear from sources |
| ⚠Michigan | 3 years from injury | Product liability claims; defendants arguing device fracture constitutes injury triggering accrual | Statutory discovery rule exists but actively contested in MDL | Targeted in Sept. 2024 MDL dismissal motion; intake must screen for removal/fracture date |
| ⚠New York | 3 years from injury | Courts apply discovery rule but defendants challenging in MDL 2974 | Under active litigation; defendants asserting fracture date controls | Included in 236-case dismissal motion; risk of dismissal if filed more than 3 years post-removal/fracture |
| ⚠Texas | 2 years from injury | Product liability accrual at injury occurrence; defendants arguing strict accrual at fracture/removal | Defendants pressing removal-date accrual in pending motion | Among 11 states in Sept. 2024 MDL dismissal motion; 2-year window creates elevated urgency |
| ⚠Tennessee | 1 year from injury | Shortest SOL among active MDL states; defendants pressing removal-date accrual | Minimal; statutory discovery provision contested | 1-year SOL plus inclusion in dismissal motion creates highest intake risk; cases likely time-barred if removal >1 year ago |
| ⚠North Carolina | 3 years from injury | Product liability with discovery rule; defendants arguing fracture date triggers accrual | Contested in MDL 2974 | Targeted in Sept. 2024 dismissal motion; screen for removal/fracture date |
| ⚠Georgia | 2 years from injury | MDL venue state with active SOL challenges; defendants asserting removal surgery date controls | Discovery rule disputed in pending motion | MDL 2974 situs (N.D. Ga., Judge Leigh Martin May); dismissal motion includes Georgia cases |
Live intelligence
AI litigation brief
Paragard remains active mdl with 19 current signals in the accepted feed.
Overview
MDL 2974 remains in active bellwether posture before Judge Leigh Martin May in the N.D. Georgia. The second federal bellwether trial, originally set for September 28, 2026, has been rescheduled to April 12, 2027 per Teva's SEC disclosure and a July 2026 court order. A third bellwether trial is stayed pending resolution of an interlocutory appeal on federal preemption issues. Case management orders governing Plaintiff Fact Sheets, Defendant Fact Sheets, and Short Form Complaints remain in effect.
Key developments
Trajectory
Court filings and press coverage are both active in MDL 2974, pointing to sustained litigation pressure rather than a one-off headline cycle. 6 live sources are contributing current context.
Editorial intelligence
MDL 2974 should stay on the lead docket watch because it is the primary consolidation vehicle for Paragard.
Generated Sep 30, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC
19 events detected
Google News (10)
Paragard IUD Lawsuits and Bellwether Trial Update - The Legal Examiner
Paragard Lawsuit Payouts & Updates (Updated Sep 2026) - LawFold.com
Hysteroscopic Retrieval of Retained and Fractured Copper Intrauterine Devices: A Case Series of Three Patients and Literature Review - Cureus
Paragard IUD MDL Judge Trims Claims For 2nd Bellwether Plaintiff - Mealey's
IUD Lawsuit 2026: Settlement Amounts & Who Qualifies - LawFold.com
After First Paragard IUD Bellwether Trial, Georgia Judge Considers Revising Bellwether Plan - Law.com
Litigators of the Week: A Defense Win for Teva in the First Paragard IUD Bellwether - Law.com
Teva Wins Jury Verdict in First Paragard IUD Bellwether Trial - Bloomberg Law News
Teva Wins 1st Paragard IUD Bellwether Trial - Law360
Teva prevails in first U.S. jury trial over Paragard IUD injury claims - Reuters
No recent PubMed signals. Monitoring is active — this section updates automatically.
No recent FDA signals. Monitoring is active — this section updates automatically.
Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation
PACER docket filed in JPML: The plaintiffs are suing a group of pharmaceutical and medical device companies over the ParaGard Intrauterine Device (IUD), which they claim is prone to breaking during removal, often at the arms, causing severe injuries that sometimes require surgical removal of the fragments. They allege that the
Defendant Fact Sheet — Paragard IUD MDL
This document is a Defendant Fact Sheet (DFS) template for the Paragard IUD MDL, requiring defendants to complete and serve it under oath per Case Management Order requirements.
Short Form Complaint
This is a blank short form complaint form for plaintiffs in the Paragard MDL, incorporating the master complaint by reference and providing fields for plaintiff and defendant information.
Plaintiff Fact Sheet (Form)
This document is the Plaintiff Fact Sheet form that each plaintiff in MDL No. 2974 must complete under oath, with instructions for representatives completing it on behalf of deceased or incapacitated plaintiffs.
Plaintiff Fact Sheet Form for MDL 2974
Document setting forth the Plaintiff Fact Sheet (PFS) that each plaintiff in MDL No. 2974 must complete under oath, including guidance for representative completions on behalf of deceased or incapacitated plaintiffs.
Short Form Complaint
This is a blank short form complaint form for plaintiffs in the Paragard MDL, incorporating the master complaint by reference and providing fields for plaintiff and defendant information.
Defendant Fact Sheet — Paragard IUD MDL
This document is a Defendant Fact Sheet (DFS) template for the Paragard IUD MDL, requiring defendants to complete and serve it under oath per Case Management Order requirements.
Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation
PACER docket entry from GAND: COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Lorena Ramirez. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AGANDC-15531629) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(aeh) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes th
Plaintiff Fact Sheet — MDL No. 2974
This document is a Plaintiff Fact Sheet (PFS) for the Paragard IUD MDL, requiring each plaintiff to complete it under oath with true and correct information.
Audit normalization notes
Workbench
Sign in to save litigations, capture notes, and monitor live signals. Sign in for unlimited.
LexGenius Ranking
88Score
Court, news, and regulatory activity are elevated
Monitoring
Live
monitoring
Last: Sep 30, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC
Next: —
Source Monitoring
PACER
PACER
Google News
MAUDE
PubMed
Event feed
19
events detected
AI Brief
Paragard remains active mdl with 19 current signals in the accepted feed.
Overview
MDL 2974 remains in active bellwether posture before Judge Leigh Martin May in the N.D. Georgia. The second federal bellwether trial, originally set for September 28, 2026, has been rescheduled to April 12, 2027 per Teva's SEC disclosure and a July 2026 court order. A third bellwether trial is stayed pending resolution of an interlocutory appeal on federal preemption issues. Case management orders governing Plaintiff Fact Sheets, Defendant Fact Sheets, and Short Form Complaints remain in effect.
Key developments
PACER court filing on Dec 31: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation. ‖ The Legal Examiner news on Sep 9: Paragard IUD Lawsuits and Bellwether Trial Update - The Legal Examiner.
Generated Sep 30, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC
Tracked MDLs
MDL 2974
N.D. Ga.
Paragard IUD products liability