Abbott SCSPENDING
Nevro SCSPENDING
Cyclosporiasis OutbreakPENDING
Apple AirTagPENDING
AI Chatbot Harm
NEWMONITOR
Roundup
ACTIVE
AFFF
ACTIVE
Depo-Provera
QUIET
Talc
ACTIVE
PFAS
ACTIVE
NEC Formula
ACTIVE
Bard Hernia Mesh
ACTIVE
Covidien Hernia Mesh
ACTIVE
Camp Lejeune
ACTIVE
Paraquat
QUIET
Social Media
ACTIVE
PowerPort
ACTIVE
AngioDynamics Port
ACTIVE
EtO Sterilization
ACTIVE
Hair Relaxer
ACTIVE
Paragard
ACTIVE
Suboxone Teeth
ACTIVE
Uber Assault
ACTIVE
Lyft Assault
ACTIVE
Ozempic Gastroparesis
ACTIVE
Ozempic NAION
ACTIVE
Church Abuse
ACTIVE
1,4-Dioxane
MONITOR
Hotel Trafficking
ACTIVE
Boy Scouts
QUIET
LDS Abuse
ACTIVE
Keytruda
ACTIVE
Tylenol
ACTIVE
Assembly of God
MONITOR
Video Game Addiction
MONITOR
CA Women's Prisons
ACTIVE
Zantac
QUIET
Dupixent CTCL
MONITOR
Boston Sci. SCS
MONITOR
ByHeart Formula
MONITOR
Cartiva
ACTIVE
Roblox
ACTIVE
Sports Betting
MONITOR
Baby Food Metals
ACTIVE
Benzene Litigation
ACTIVE
Discord Abuse
ACTIVE
Social Media Sextortion
ACTIVE
UPF Litigation
MONITOR
48Tracked
30Active
4Pending
Navigation
Abbott SCSPENDING
Nevro SCSPENDING
Cyclosporiasis OutbreakPENDING
Apple AirTagPENDING
AI Chatbot Harm
NEWMONITOR
Roundup
ACTIVE
AFFF
ACTIVE
Depo-Provera
QUIET
Talc
ACTIVE
PFAS
ACTIVE
NEC Formula
ACTIVE
Bard Hernia Mesh
ACTIVE
Covidien Hernia Mesh
ACTIVE
Camp Lejeune
ACTIVE
Paraquat
QUIET
Social Media
ACTIVE
PowerPort
ACTIVE
AngioDynamics Port
ACTIVE
EtO Sterilization
ACTIVE
Hair Relaxer
ACTIVE
Paragard
ACTIVE
Suboxone Teeth
ACTIVE
Uber Assault
ACTIVE
Lyft Assault
ACTIVE
Ozempic Gastroparesis
ACTIVE
Ozempic NAION
ACTIVE
Church Abuse
ACTIVE
1,4-Dioxane
MONITOR
Hotel Trafficking
ACTIVE
Boy Scouts
QUIET
LDS Abuse
ACTIVE
Keytruda
ACTIVE
Tylenol
ACTIVE
Assembly of God
MONITOR
Video Game Addiction
MONITOR
CA Women's Prisons
ACTIVE
Zantac
QUIET
Dupixent CTCL
MONITOR
Boston Sci. SCS
MONITOR
ByHeart Formula
MONITOR
Cartiva
ACTIVE
Roblox
ACTIVE
Sports Betting
MONITOR
Baby Food Metals
ACTIVE
Benzene Litigation
ACTIVE
Discord Abuse
ACTIVE
Social Media Sextortion
ACTIVE
UPF Litigation
MONITOR
48Tracked
30Active
4Pending
LexGenius Logo
LexGeniusYour Edge in Mass Litigation
PricingDaily DocketTrack litigations freeSign in
LexGenius

LexGenius

Your Edge in Mass Litigation

DisclaimerAcceptable UseTermsPrivacyCookie PolicySupport

© 2026 LexGenius. All rights reserved.

Active MDL19 eventsMedical Device

Paragard

Medical Device · claims that copper IUD arms fractured during removal and caused complications

Defendant

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.

MDL / Track

MDL 2974

N.D. Ga.

Judge

Judge Leigh Martin May

Plaintiffs

roughly 3,984 pending (3,926 per JPML March 2, 2026 report, plus 58 new filings tracked since)

Bellwether / Trial

  • Defense verdict for Teva in first bellwether (Rickard v. Teva, Feb. 4, 2026)
  • no subsequent verdicts

Settlement Status

  • No global settlement
  • no settlement fund established
  • no claim deadline
Home/Torts/ParaGard
SharePost on XShare on BlueskyShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookEmail

Track litigations for free. Save this matter, capture notes, and monitor live signals.

Sign in
← Torts Case overview Litigation status Geographic exposure Key defendants Timeline Statute of limitations Live activity Leadership News PubMed openFDA Court filings

Case overview

The Paragard IUD MDL 2974 remains active in the Northern District of Georgia before Judge Leigh Martin May with approximately 4,000 cases pending as of mid-2026. Teva Pharmaceuticals secured a complete defense verdict in the first bellwether trial, Rickard v. Teva Pharmaceuticals and CooperSurgical, on February 4, 2026, with the jury rejecting failure-to-warn and defective-design claims. A second bellwether trial is scheduled for September 28, 2026, with no global settlement reached.

Causation Theory

Plaintiffs allege the Paragard's polyethylene plastic arms become brittle during the device's implantation period, causing them to fracture rather than flex during standard string-pull removal. A 2023 FDA review estimated breakage frequency at 0.08% to 0.15% but noted methodological limitations and lack of robust design testing due to the device's 1984 origin. A 2023 study by Nguyen et al. analyzing FDA Adverse Event Reporting System data found 4,144 copper IUD breakage reports versus 2,140 hormonal IUD reports from 1998-2022, with mechanical testing by Creinin et al. suggesting copper IUD frame design concentrates stress at arm-stem joints compared to hormonal alternatives.

Case Management Orders

Litigation status

MDL 2974 remains in active bellwether posture before Judge Leigh Martin May in the N.D. Georgia. The second federal bellwether trial, originally set for September 28, 2026, has been rescheduled to April 12, 2027 per Teva's SEC disclosure and a July 2026 court order. A third bellwether trial is stayed pending resolution of an interlocutory appeal on federal preemption issues. Case management orders governing Plaintiff Fact Sheets, Defendant Fact Sheets, and Short Form Complaints remain in effect.

MDL Track

MDL 2974

N.D. Ga.

Paragard IUD products liability

3,926 pending

State Court Activity

New Jersey state court case scheduled for trial Sept. 14, 2026 (separate from federal MDL)

MDL 2974 Leadership

Plaintiff Leadership

Co-Lead Counsel

Erin K Copeland

Fibich, Leebron, Copeland & Briggs

ecopeland@fibichlaw.com713-231-5961

Timothy Clark

Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers LLC

info@rosenfeldinjurylaw.com888-424-5757

Liaison Counsel

C. Andrew Childers

Childers, Schlueter & Smith, LLC

AChilders@cssfirm.com404-419-9500

Geographic exposure

Approximately 3,595-3,926 cases pending in MDL 2974 as of mid-2026. FDA data: over 7,000 adverse event reports of Paragard breakage, nearly 6,000 classified serious, with 1,231 breakage reports in 2023 alone—highest annual total recorded. No global settlement; litigation in post-first-bellwether phase with defense verdict in Rickard v. Teva Pharmaceuticals and CooperSurgical (N.D. Ga.). State SOL windows vary 2-6 years per source guidance; intake teams must prioritize SOL screening as MDL age exceeds typical product liability limitations periods in majority of states.

  • Northern District of Georgia

    MDL 2974, In re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation, presided over by Judge Leigh Martin May. Approximately 3,595 cases pending as of April 2026 per Halstonberg; other source cites approximately 3,926 cases. First bellwether trial (Rickard v. Teva Pharmaceuticals and CooperSurgical) ended in defense verdict February 2026; second bellwether rescheduled for fall 2026. Active discovery continues. Direct filing order permits cases to be filed directly into MDL.

  • Buffalo/North Tonawanda, New York area

    CooperSurgical Paragard manufacturing plant site of repeated FDA inspections. 2022 FDA inspection faulted manufacturer for failing to 'adequately investigate breakage complaints' and failing to 'implement adequate corrective action and preventive action plans' (CAPAs). 2024 reinspection found 11 of 11 CAPAs still deficient per Spotlight on America. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System shows 1,231 breakage reports in 2023, highest single-year total on record; over 7,000 total complaints with nearly 6,000 classified as serious.

  • California

    State with 2-year statute of limitations for product liability claims per general source guidance. SOL window narrowing for injuries discovered before 2024. Discovery rule may extend filing window for breakage cases discovered after initial injury event.

  • Texas

    State with 2-year statute of limitations for product liability per general source guidance. SOL gatekeeping increasingly critical for new intakes as MDL matures.

  • Florida

    4-year statute of limitations for product liability claims per general source guidance provides comparatively wider intake window.

  • New York

    3-year statute of limitations for product liability per general source guidance. Proximity to manufacturing plant and FDA inspection site. Discovery rule applicable; breakage cases with delayed fragment discovery may retain viable claims.

  • Ohio

    2-year statute of limitations with discovery rule per general source guidance. Cases require immediate SOL analysis for breakage events occurring 2022 or earlier.

  • Pennsylvania

    2-year statute of limitations per general source guidance. SOL compression active for plaintiffs with breakage events predating 2024.

Key defendants

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.

Role: Manufacturer

Core defendant in MDL 2974. Filed motion to dismiss 236 time-barred cases Sept. 2024; actively contesting statute of limitations/repose. Parent Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. disclosed July 2023.

CooperSurgical, Inc.

Role: Manufacturer

Co-defendant with Teva. Joined dismissal motion targeting stale claims. Corporate parent The Cooper Companies, Inc. disclosed. Withdrawal of opposition to CTO-58 filed Aug. 2023.

Teva Women's Health, LLC

Role: Manufacturer

Named in master complaint; successor to Teva Women's Health, Inc. (terminated from docket April 2021). Active in bellwether discovery per Oct. 2024 orders.

DefendantRoleIntelligence Note
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.ManufacturerCore defendant in MDL 2974. Filed motion to dismiss 236 time-barred cases Sept. 2024; actively contesting statute of limitations/repose. Parent Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. disclosed July 2023.
CooperSurgical, Inc.ManufacturerCo-defendant with Teva. Joined dismissal motion targeting stale claims. Corporate parent The Cooper Companies, Inc. disclosed. Withdrawal of opposition to CTO-58 filed Aug. 2023.
Teva Women's Health, LLCManufacturerNamed in master complaint; successor to Teva Women's Health, Inc. (terminated from docket April 2021). Active in bellwether discovery per Oct. 2024 orders.

Timeline

  1. 2026-09

    Second Bellwether Trial Begins

    Second bellwether trial in MDL 2974 begins September 28, 2026, before Judge Leigh Martin May in the Northern District of Georgia. Third bellwether stayed pending Eleventh Circuit interlocutory appeal on federal preemption.

  2. 2026-08

    MDL Reaches 4,156 Pending Cases

    MDL 2974 docket reaches 4,156 pending lawsuits as of August 3, 2026, per court records.

  3. 2026-04

    Eleventh Circuit Grants Preemption Appeal

    Eleventh Circuit grants Teva's interlocutory appeal on federal preemption question. Broader litigation stayed after next bellwether concludes pending appeal outcome.

  4. 2026-02

    First Bellwether Ends in Defense Verdict

    Jury returns complete defense verdict for Teva in Rickard v. Teva Pharmaceuticals after two-week trial in Atlanta. All claims rejected: strict liability failure to warn, negligent failure to warn, defective design, negligent design, negligent misrepresentation, and fraudulent omission. No damages reached.

  5. 2026-01

    First Bellwether Trial Proceeds

    Rickard v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, first MDL 2974 bellwether, begins January 20, 2026. Teva's emergency appeal to delay trial denied.

  6. 2025-10

    Bellwether Trial Order Finalized

    Judge Leigh Martin May finalizes bellwether trial order in MDL 2974, setting three test trials for early 2026.

  7. 2021

    FDA Initiates IUD Breakage Safety Review

    FDA launches safety review of IUD breakage after adverse event report volume reaches threshold requiring agency action. Review results in updated Paragard labeling; no recall issued.

  8. 2020-12

    JPML Creates MDL 2974

    Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidates 55 actions from 31 districts into MDL No. 2974, In re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation, assigned to Judge Leigh Martin May in the Northern District of Georgia.

  9. 2017-09

    CooperSurgical Acquires Paragard

    Teva Pharmaceuticals sells Paragard to CooperSurgical, a subsidiary of The Cooper Companies, for $1.1 billion.

Statute of limitations

MDL 2974 (In re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation), Judge Leigh Martin May, N.D. Ga. Defendants' Sept. 12, 2024 motion seeks dismissal of 236 cases across 11 states, arguing accrual at device fracture/removal—not subsequent injury discovery. First bellwether trial reset to Jan. 20, 2026 per sources. Intake must prioritize: (1) exact removal/fracture date over symptom onset; (2) state of filing vs. state of injury. No global settlement per sources; individual case viability increasingly SOL-dependent.

⚠ 7 states with critical SOL — act immediately

⚠Alabama

2 years from injury

Rule: Accrual tied to removal surgery date per defendants' Sept. 2024 motion; discovery rule disputed

Discovery: Defendants arguing clock starts at fracture/removal, not later discovery of injury

Among 11 states in Sept. 12, 2024 MDL 2974 dismissal motion targeting 236 cases; motion status unclear from sources

⚠Michigan

3 years from injury

Rule: Product liability claims; defendants arguing device fracture constitutes injury triggering accrual

Discovery: Statutory discovery rule exists but actively contested in MDL

Targeted in Sept. 2024 MDL dismissal motion; intake must screen for removal/fracture date

⚠New York

3 years from injury

Rule: Courts apply discovery rule but defendants challenging in MDL 2974

Discovery: Under active litigation; defendants asserting fracture date controls

Included in 236-case dismissal motion; risk of dismissal if filed more than 3 years post-removal/fracture

⚠Texas

2 years from injury

Rule: Product liability accrual at injury occurrence; defendants arguing strict accrual at fracture/removal

Discovery: Defendants pressing removal-date accrual in pending motion

Among 11 states in Sept. 2024 MDL dismissal motion; 2-year window creates elevated urgency

⚠Tennessee

1 year from injury

Rule: Shortest SOL among active MDL states; defendants pressing removal-date accrual

Discovery: Minimal; statutory discovery provision contested

1-year SOL plus inclusion in dismissal motion creates highest intake risk; cases likely time-barred if removal >1 year ago

⚠North Carolina

3 years from injury

Rule: Product liability with discovery rule; defendants arguing fracture date triggers accrual

Discovery: Contested in MDL 2974

Targeted in Sept. 2024 dismissal motion; screen for removal/fracture date

⚠Georgia

2 years from injury

Rule: MDL venue state with active SOL challenges; defendants asserting removal surgery date controls

Discovery: Discovery rule disputed in pending motion

MDL 2974 situs (N.D. Ga., Judge Leigh Martin May); dismissal motion includes Georgia cases

StateSOLRuleDiscovery RuleNotes
⚠Alabama2 years from injuryAccrual tied to removal surgery date per defendants' Sept. 2024 motion; discovery rule disputedDefendants arguing clock starts at fracture/removal, not later discovery of injuryAmong 11 states in Sept. 12, 2024 MDL 2974 dismissal motion targeting 236 cases; motion status unclear from sources
⚠Michigan3 years from injuryProduct liability claims; defendants arguing device fracture constitutes injury triggering accrualStatutory discovery rule exists but actively contested in MDLTargeted in Sept. 2024 MDL dismissal motion; intake must screen for removal/fracture date
⚠New York3 years from injuryCourts apply discovery rule but defendants challenging in MDL 2974Under active litigation; defendants asserting fracture date controlsIncluded in 236-case dismissal motion; risk of dismissal if filed more than 3 years post-removal/fracture
⚠Texas2 years from injuryProduct liability accrual at injury occurrence; defendants arguing strict accrual at fracture/removalDefendants pressing removal-date accrual in pending motionAmong 11 states in Sept. 2024 MDL dismissal motion; 2-year window creates elevated urgency
⚠Tennessee1 year from injuryShortest SOL among active MDL states; defendants pressing removal-date accrualMinimal; statutory discovery provision contested1-year SOL plus inclusion in dismissal motion creates highest intake risk; cases likely time-barred if removal >1 year ago
⚠North Carolina3 years from injuryProduct liability with discovery rule; defendants arguing fracture date triggers accrualContested in MDL 2974Targeted in Sept. 2024 dismissal motion; screen for removal/fracture date
⚠Georgia2 years from injuryMDL venue state with active SOL challenges; defendants asserting removal surgery date controlsDiscovery rule disputed in pending motionMDL 2974 situs (N.D. Ga., Judge Leigh Martin May); dismissal motion includes Georgia cases

Live intelligence

AI litigation brief

Paragard remains active mdl with 19 current signals in the accepted feed.

Overview

MDL 2974 remains in active bellwether posture before Judge Leigh Martin May in the N.D. Georgia. The second federal bellwether trial, originally set for September 28, 2026, has been rescheduled to April 12, 2027 per Teva's SEC disclosure and a July 2026 court order. A third bellwether trial is stayed pending resolution of an interlocutory appeal on federal preemption issues. Case management orders governing Plaintiff Fact Sheets, Defendant Fact Sheets, and Short Form Complaints remain in effect.

Key developments

  • PACER court filing on Dec 31: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation
  • The Legal Examiner news on Sep 9: Paragard IUD Lawsuits and Bellwether Trial Update - The Legal Examiner

Trajectory

Court filings and press coverage are both active in MDL 2974, pointing to sustained litigation pressure rather than a one-off headline cycle. 6 live sources are contributing current context.

Editorial intelligence

MDL 2974 should stay on the lead docket watch because it is the primary consolidation vehicle for Paragard.

Generated Sep 30, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC

19 events detected

Google News (10)

  • Paragard IUD Lawsuits and Bellwether Trial Update - The Legal Examiner

    The Legal ExaminerSep 9, 2026, 12:55 PM UTC
  • Paragard Lawsuit Payouts & Updates (Updated Sep 2026) - LawFold.com

    LawFold.comSep 1, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • Hysteroscopic Retrieval of Retained and Fractured Copper Intrauterine Devices: A Case Series of Three Patients and Literature Review - Cureus

    CureusJul 17, 2026, 7:23 AM UTC
  • Paragard IUD MDL Judge Trims Claims For 2nd Bellwether Plaintiff - Mealey's

    Mealey'sJul 2, 2026, 12:06 PM UTC
  • IUD Lawsuit 2026: Settlement Amounts & Who Qualifies - LawFold.com

    LawFold.comMay 1, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • After First Paragard IUD Bellwether Trial, Georgia Judge Considers Revising Bellwether Plan - Law.com

    Law.comFeb 17, 2026, 8:00 AM UTC
  • Litigators of the Week: A Defense Win for Teva in the First Paragard IUD Bellwether - Law.com

    Law.comFeb 6, 2026, 8:00 AM UTC
  • Teva Wins Jury Verdict in First Paragard IUD Bellwether Trial - Bloomberg Law News

    Bloomberg Law NewsFeb 5, 2026, 8:00 AM UTC
  • Teva Wins 1st Paragard IUD Bellwether Trial - Law360

    Law360Feb 4, 2026, 8:00 AM UTC
  • Teva prevails in first U.S. jury trial over Paragard IUD injury claims - Reuters

    ReutersFeb 4, 2026, 8:00 AM UTC

No recent PubMed signals. Monitoring is active — this section updates automatically.

No recent FDA signals. Monitoring is active — this section updates automatically.

PACERJPMLmdl-2974-stubDec 31, 2099, 12:00 AM UTC

Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation

PACER docket filed in JPML: The plaintiffs are suing a group of pharmaceutical and medical device companies over the ParaGard Intrauterine Device (IUD), which they claim is prone to breaking during removal, often at the arms, causing severe injuries that sometimes require surgical removal of the fragments. They allege that the

FILING_INSTRUCTIONSep 30, 2026, 9:07 AM UTC

Defendant Fact Sheet — Paragard IUD MDL

This document is a Defendant Fact Sheet (DFS) template for the Paragard IUD MDL, requiring defendants to complete and serve it under oath per Case Management Order requirements.

FILING_INSTRUCTIONSep 30, 2026, 9:07 AM UTC

Short Form Complaint

This is a blank short form complaint form for plaintiffs in the Paragard MDL, incorporating the master complaint by reference and providing fields for plaintiff and defendant information.

FILING_INSTRUCTIONSep 30, 2026, 3:07 AM UTC

Plaintiff Fact Sheet (Form)

This document is the Plaintiff Fact Sheet form that each plaintiff in MDL No. 2974 must complete under oath, with instructions for representatives completing it on behalf of deceased or incapacitated plaintiffs.

FILING_INSTRUCTIONSep 21, 2026, 4:07 AM UTC

Plaintiff Fact Sheet Form for MDL 2974

Document setting forth the Plaintiff Fact Sheet (PFS) that each plaintiff in MDL No. 2974 must complete under oath, including guidance for representative completions on behalf of deceased or incapacitated plaintiffs.

FILING_INSTRUCTIONSep 21, 2026, 4:07 AM UTC

Short Form Complaint

This is a blank short form complaint form for plaintiffs in the Paragard MDL, incorporating the master complaint by reference and providing fields for plaintiff and defendant information.

FILING_INSTRUCTIONSep 21, 2026, 4:07 AM UTC

Defendant Fact Sheet — Paragard IUD MDL

This document is a Defendant Fact Sheet (DFS) template for the Paragard IUD MDL, requiring defendants to complete and serve it under oath per Case Management Order requirements.

PACERGAND1:26-cv-05188Sep 9, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation

PACER docket entry from GAND: COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Lorena Ramirez. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AGANDC-15531629) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(aeh) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes th

FILING_INSTRUCTIONAug 26, 2026, 5:07 PM UTC

Plaintiff Fact Sheet — MDL No. 2974

This document is a Plaintiff Fact Sheet (PFS) for the Paragard IUD MDL, requiring each plaintiff to complete it under oath with true and correct information.

Audit normalization notes

  • Normalized a source-site outlier template into the canonical detail-page section set.

Workbench

Sign in to save litigations, capture notes, and monitor live signals. Sign in for unlimited.

LexGenius Ranking

88Score

Court, news, and regulatory activity are elevated

Evidence16 / 20
Momentum20 / 20
Exposure16 / 20
Regulatory16 / 20
Legal20 / 20

Monitoring

Live

monitoring

Last: Sep 30, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC

Next: —

Source Monitoring

PACER

1m 56s

PACER

1m 56s

Google News

1m 56s

MAUDE

1m 56s

PubMed

16m 56s

Event feed

19

events detected

Google NewsPACER

AI Brief

Paragard remains active mdl with 19 current signals in the accepted feed.

Overview

MDL 2974 remains in active bellwether posture before Judge Leigh Martin May in the N.D. Georgia. The second federal bellwether trial, originally set for September 28, 2026, has been rescheduled to April 12, 2027 per Teva's SEC disclosure and a July 2026 court order. A third bellwether trial is stayed pending resolution of an interlocutory appeal on federal preemption issues. Case management orders governing Plaintiff Fact Sheets, Defendant Fact Sheets, and Short Form Complaints remain in effect.

Key developments

PACER court filing on Dec 31: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation. ‖ The Legal Examiner news on Sep 9: Paragard IUD Lawsuits and Bellwether Trial Update - The Legal Examiner.

Generated Sep 30, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC

Tracked MDLs

MDL 2974

N.D. Ga.

Paragard IUD products liability

← Previous

Hair Relaxer

Tracks chemical hair-relaxer litigation, product safety reporting, and emerging health literature.

Next →

Suboxone Teeth

Tracks dental-injury litigation, drug-safety notices, and clinical reporting related to Suboxone use.