| ⚠Arkansas | Age 21 (general personal injury); revival window struck down | Ark. Code Ann. § 16-56-104 (three-year personal injury); childhood sexual abuse claims subject to age-21 cap under pre-2021 law. Court of Appeals struck down Justice for Vulnerable Victims of Sex Abuse Act revival provisions Feb. 5, 2025, citing 110+ years of precedent against reviving expired limitations periods. | — | Revival window CLOSED. Court of Appeals ruled legislature cannot revive time-barred claims. Pending cases dismissed. New filings must satisfy pre-2021 age-21 limitation or face certain dismissal. Active Assemblies of God litigation in Jonesboro (KATV, May 21, 2026) faces this bar. |
| California | Age 26 or 3 years from discovery, whichever is later; for entities with notice/knowledge of abuser and failure to safeguard, 3 years from discovery only | Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 340.1(a)(1)-(3), (b)(1)-(2). Perpetrators: later of age 26 or 3 years from discovery. Non-abuser entities with notice of abuser and failure to implement safeguards: 3 years from discovery, no age cap. Other non-abusers: age 26 cap. Roe 58 v. Doe 1, 120 Cal.Rptr.3d 311 (Ct. App. 2011) confirmed structure. | Discovery of causal link between adult-onset psychological injury and molestation triggers 3-year period for perpetrator and notice-failure entity claims. Knowledge of abuse alone insufficient for non-perpetrator claims. | 2003 revival window (§ 340.1(c)) expired Dec. 31, 2003. No current revival. Screen for entity notice/failure-to-safeguard under subdivision (b)(2) to avoid age-26 cap. |
| Illinois | 10 years from date limitation period begins to run under subsection (d), or 5 years from discovery of abuse and causal injury, whichever is longer; no statute of repose | 735 ILCS 5/13-202.2(b), as amended 2003. Legislature removed statute of repose and clarified discovery rule. M.K. v. L.C., 901 N.E.2d 468, 387 Ill.App.3d 1077 (3d Dist. 2009): repeal of repose applies retroactively; claims not extinguished by former repose. | Discovery requires knowledge of both (i) abuse occurred AND (ii) injury caused by abuse. Knowledge of abuse alone insufficient. 5-year period runs from discovery of both elements. | No age cap. Repose repeal preserved otherwise-barred claims. Screen for date of discovery of causal injury, not merely abuse events. |
| New Hampshire | 3 years from discovery of injury and its causal relationship to act or omission | RSA 508:4, I (post-1986 amendment). Codified discovery rule for personal actions. Applies to causes arising on or after July 1, 1986. Conrad v. Hazen, 140 N.H. 249, 665 A.2d 372 (1995): cause of action 'arises' when all elements present; 'accrues' upon discovery of injury and cause. | Common-law discovery rule codified: accrual upon plaintiff's discovery or reasonable-diligence discovery of injury AND causal relationship. Repressed memory may delay accrual. | Pre-1986 causes: 6-year limitations, common-law discovery rule applied. Screen date of abuse against July 1, 1986 cutoff for applicable statute. |
| South Carolina | 6 years from accrual; 1 year after age 21 for claims accruing before Moriarty | S.C. Code Ann. § 15-3-40 (1977). Moriarty v. Garden Sanctuary Church, 334 S.C. 150, 511 S.E.2d 699 (Ct. App. 1999), aff'd, 341 S.C. 320, 534 S.E.2d 672 (2000): discovery rule applies to repressed memory cases; repressed memory syndrome (Dissociative Amnesia) recognized as valid theory. | Discovery rule applies where repressed memory prevents knowledge of abuse. Accrual delayed until memory recovered or reasonably discoverable. Overruled Doe v. R.D. rigid age-21 bar for repressed memory plaintiffs. | Post-Moriarty: repressed memory plaintiffs may invoke discovery rule to avoid 1-year-after-21 bar. Screen for documented therapy records, psychiatric diagnosis, or corroborating witnesses supporting repressed memory claim. |