Abbott SCSPENDING
Nevro SCSPENDING
Cyclosporiasis OutbreakPENDING
Apple AirTagPENDING
AI Chatbot Harm
NEWMONITOR
Roundup
ACTIVE
AFFF
ACTIVE
Depo-Provera
QUIET
Talc
ACTIVE
PFAS
ACTIVE
NEC Formula
ACTIVE
Bard Hernia Mesh
ACTIVE
Covidien Hernia Mesh
ACTIVE
Camp Lejeune
ACTIVE
Paraquat
QUIET
Social Media
ACTIVE
PowerPort
ACTIVE
AngioDynamics Port
ACTIVE
EtO Sterilization
ACTIVE
Hair Relaxer
ACTIVE
Paragard
ACTIVE
Suboxone Teeth
ACTIVE
Uber Assault
ACTIVE
Lyft Assault
ACTIVE
Ozempic Gastroparesis
ACTIVE
Ozempic NAION
ACTIVE
Church Abuse
ACTIVE
1,4-Dioxane
MONITOR
Hotel Trafficking
ACTIVE
Boy Scouts
QUIET
LDS Abuse
ACTIVE
Keytruda
ACTIVE
Tylenol
ACTIVE
Assembly of God
MONITOR
Video Game Addiction
MONITOR
CA Women's Prisons
ACTIVE
Zantac
QUIET
Dupixent CTCL
MONITOR
Boston Sci. SCS
MONITOR
ByHeart Formula
MONITOR
Cartiva
ACTIVE
Roblox
ACTIVE
Sports Betting
MONITOR
Baby Food Metals
ACTIVE
Benzene Litigation
ACTIVE
Discord Abuse
ACTIVE
Social Media Sextortion
ACTIVE
UPF Litigation
MONITOR
48Tracked
30Active
4Pending
Navigation
Abbott SCSPENDING
Nevro SCSPENDING
Cyclosporiasis OutbreakPENDING
Apple AirTagPENDING
AI Chatbot Harm
NEWMONITOR
Roundup
ACTIVE
AFFF
ACTIVE
Depo-Provera
QUIET
Talc
ACTIVE
PFAS
ACTIVE
NEC Formula
ACTIVE
Bard Hernia Mesh
ACTIVE
Covidien Hernia Mesh
ACTIVE
Camp Lejeune
ACTIVE
Paraquat
QUIET
Social Media
ACTIVE
PowerPort
ACTIVE
AngioDynamics Port
ACTIVE
EtO Sterilization
ACTIVE
Hair Relaxer
ACTIVE
Paragard
ACTIVE
Suboxone Teeth
ACTIVE
Uber Assault
ACTIVE
Lyft Assault
ACTIVE
Ozempic Gastroparesis
ACTIVE
Ozempic NAION
ACTIVE
Church Abuse
ACTIVE
1,4-Dioxane
MONITOR
Hotel Trafficking
ACTIVE
Boy Scouts
QUIET
LDS Abuse
ACTIVE
Keytruda
ACTIVE
Tylenol
ACTIVE
Assembly of God
MONITOR
Video Game Addiction
MONITOR
CA Women's Prisons
ACTIVE
Zantac
QUIET
Dupixent CTCL
MONITOR
Boston Sci. SCS
MONITOR
ByHeart Formula
MONITOR
Cartiva
ACTIVE
Roblox
ACTIVE
Sports Betting
MONITOR
Baby Food Metals
ACTIVE
Benzene Litigation
ACTIVE
Discord Abuse
ACTIVE
Social Media Sextortion
ACTIVE
UPF Litigation
MONITOR
48Tracked
30Active
4Pending
LexGenius Logo
LexGeniusYour Edge in Mass Litigation
PricingDaily DocketTrack litigations freeSign in
LexGenius

LexGenius

Your Edge in Mass Litigation

DisclaimerAcceptable UseTermsPrivacyCookie PolicySupport

© 2026 LexGenius. All rights reserved.

Active MDL61 eventsMedical Device

Bard PowerPort

Medical Device · claims involving implanted catheter ports and alleged fracture, migration, or infection risks

Defendant

Becton, Dickinson and Company

MDL / Track

MDL 3081

D. Ariz.

Judge

Senior Judge David G. Campbell

Plaintiffs

roughly 2,862 pending claims (2,828 per JPML's March 2, 2026 report, plus ~34 new filings tracked since)

Bellwether / Trial

  • Defense verdict on warning/instruction and consumer fraud claims with jury deadlocked on design defect, Cook v. Becton Dickinson (May 2026)
  • $40M plaintiff verdict, Divelbliss v. Becton Dickinson (Sept. 2026)

Settlement Status

  • No global settlement reached
  • Cook plaintiff filed motion for new trial in June 2026, undecided as of September 2026
Home/Torts/Bard PowerPort
SharePost on XShare on BlueskyShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookEmail

Track litigations for free. Save this matter, capture notes, and monitor live signals.

Sign in
← Torts Case overview Litigation status Geographic exposure Key defendants Timeline Statute of limitations Live activity Leadership News PubMed openFDA Court filings

Case overview

The Bard PowerPort MDL 3081 (In re: Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation) has entered active bellwether trials before Judge David G. Campbell in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, with approximately 3,044–3,734 federal cases pending as of mid-2026. On March 5, 2026, Judge Campbell denied nearly all of Bard's summary judgment motions, preserving plaintiffs' design defect and failure-to-warn claims. The first bellwether trial, Cook v. Becton Dickinson (an infection case), concluded in May 2026 with a defense verdict on failure-to-warn and consumer-fraud claims, but the jury deadlocked on the design-defect question. The second bellwether, Divelbliss v. Becton Dickinson—the first to squarely test the catheter fracture theory—opened August 18, 2026, with four additional bellwether trials scheduled through February 2027.

Causation Theory

Plaintiffs allege that Bard PowerPort catheters suffer from material degradation causing fracture, migration, and infection. The core engineering theory holds that excessive barium sulfate concentration—added for radiopacity—creates microscopic voids in the polyurethane polymer, weakening the catheter wall under physiological flexion from cardiac and respiratory motion, leading to crack propagation and eventual fracture. Fractured fragments then embolize through the vascular system to the heart or lungs. Plaintiffs further allege that surface defects from material degradation provide bacterial colonization sites, causing bloodstream infections and sepsis. The FDA's MAUDE database contains thousands of adverse event reports documenting catheter fractures, migrations, infections, and deaths. Bard previously issued device recalls in 2019 and 2021 for component-related issues.

Case Management Orders

Litigation status

MDL 3081 is in active bellwether phase before Senior Judge David G. Campbell in D. Ariz. The second bellwether trial, Divelbliss v. Becton Dickinson, concluded September 2026 with a $40 million plaintiff verdict on catheter fracture claims. Three additional bellwether trials are scheduled: October 13, 2026; December 1, 2026; and February 2, 2027.

MDL Track

MDL 3081

D. Ariz.

Bard implanted port catheter products liability

2,828 pending

MDL 3081 Leadership

Plaintiff Leadership

Plaintiffs' Executive Committee

Shanon J. Carson

Berger Montague

shanonc@bm.net215-875-4656

Danae Benton

The Cochran Firm – Dallas, PLLC

dbenton@cochrantexas.com214-651-4260

Dimitri Dube

The Cochran Firm – Dallas, PLLC

ddube@cochrantexas.com214-651-4260

Adam Evans

Evans Law Firm, LLC

adam@evanslawkc.com816-301-4089

Brandon D. Henry

Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP

bhenry@wagstaffcartmell.com816-221-0714

Plaintiffs' Steering Committee

Jennifer P. Elwell

Berger Montague

jelwell@bm.net215-875-3072

Alex Barlow

Scott & Scott

abarlow@scott-scott.com512-337-8432

Michael Sacchet

Ciresi Conlin, LLP

kma@ciresiconlin.com612-380-8220

Co-Lead Counsel

Rebecca Phillips

The Lanier Law Firm

rebecca.phillips@lanierlawfirm.com713-659-5200

Plaintiff Liaison Counsel

Steven German

Steve German, A Law Firm

steve@lawfirmaz.com480-626-2700

Geographic exposure

More than 3,700 federal cases pending in MDL 3081 as of August 2026, with additional state court filings. Device widely distributed for chemotherapy, antibiotic therapy, and parenteral nutrition. No mandatory recall; devices remain in use. CDC identifies indwelling central lines as among the best-documented infection risks in the device category.

  • District of Arizona

    MDL 3081, In re: Bard PowerPort Products Liability Litigation, presided over by Judge David G. Campbell. Federal docket exceeds 3,700 cases as of August 2026, with more than 1,000 added since January 2026. First bellwether trial concluded April 2026 with defense verdict on warning and consumer-fraud claims.

  • Nationwide — oncology and infusion centers

    Bard PowerPort devices implanted for chemotherapy, long-term antibiotics, IV nutrition, and frequent blood draws. Claims allege barium sulfate polyurethane catheter degradation leading to fracture, migration, infection, thrombosis, and cardiac/pulmonary injury. No device recall or FDA safety communication issued.

  • FDA MAUDE database

    Thousands of adverse event reports filed for Bard PowerPort devices, including catheter fractures, infections, and deaths. Reports document device failures requiring explant, emergency intervention, and hospitalization.

  • State courts nationwide

    Additional cases proceeding outside MDL 3081. Statutes of limitation vary by state and depend on injury discovery date. Filing windows may be shorter than anticipated; active intake required to preserve claims.

  • Cancer treatment centers — pediatric and adult

    12-year study of 4,920 central lines (including ports) in cancer patients found 3.6% symptomatic catheter-related thrombosis rate. Highest risk in certain catheter types, younger patients, and prior clot history.

Key defendants

Becton, Dickinson and Company

Role: Parent Company / Manufacturer

Acquired Bard Access Systems in 2017; MDL 3081 allegations focus on successor liability and post-acquisition failure to redesign polyurethane catheter tubing. Centralized before Judge David G. Campbell in D. Ariz.

Bard Access Systems, Inc.

Role: Manufacturer

Original PowerPort designer and manufacturer; named in master complaints for design defect, failure to warn, and manufacturing defect claims. Wholly-owned subsidiary of Becton Dickinson.

C.R. Bard, Inc.

Role: Manufacturer

Legacy entity named in early complaints; defense opposed MDL centralization arguing informal coordination suffices. JPML overruled objection, establishing MDL 3081 in July 2023.

DefendantRoleIntelligence Note
Becton, Dickinson and CompanyParent Company / ManufacturerAcquired Bard Access Systems in 2017; MDL 3081 allegations focus on successor liability and post-acquisition failure to redesign polyurethane catheter tubing. Centralized before Judge David G. Campbell in D. Ariz.
Bard Access Systems, Inc.ManufacturerOriginal PowerPort designer and manufacturer; named in master complaints for design defect, failure to warn, and manufacturing defect claims. Wholly-owned subsidiary of Becton Dickinson.
C.R. Bard, Inc.ManufacturerLegacy entity named in early complaints; defense opposed MDL centralization arguing informal coordination suffices. JPML overruled objection, establishing MDL 3081 in July 2023.

Timeline

  1. 2023-08

    JPML Creates MDL 3081 in Arizona

    Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated federal Bard PowerPort lawsuits as MDL No. 3081 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, assigned to Judge David G. Campbell. Transfer order signed August 8, 2023.

  2. 2023-09

    Judge Campbell Approves Plaintiffs' Leadership Structure

    Judge Campbell issued Case Management Order No. 1, appointing co-lead counsel, executive committee, and steering committee drawn from approximately 30 firms to manage MDL 3081.

  3. 2023-11

    CMO No. 7 Establishes Pleading Structure

    Court entered Case Management Order No. 7, establishing master complaint and short-form complaint framework for MDL 3081.

  4. 2026-02

    Judge Campbell Limits FDA Expert Testimony

    Judge Campbell prohibited Bard's FDA expert from testifying that 510(k) clearance equated to safety or effectiveness, ruling such opinions would mislead the jury. Order dated March 21, 2026.

  5. 2026-03

    Judge Campbell Denies Bard Summary Judgment

    Judge Campbell largely denied Bard's summary judgment motion in first bellwether case, preserving design defect, failure-to-warn, and punitive damages claims and rejecting learned intermediary defense. Order dated March 5, 2026.

  6. 2026-04

    First Bellwether Trial Begins

    Cook v. C.R. Bard/Becton Dickinson, an infection claim, began trial April 21, 2026 before Judge Campbell in Phoenix. Case selected as first of six bellwether trials.

  7. 2026-05

    Split Verdict in First Bellwether

    Jury returned defense verdict for Bard on failure-to-warn, failure-to-instruct, and consumer fraud claims, but deadlocked on design defect and unlawful trade practices claims. Verdict entered May 8, 2026.

  8. 2026-06

    Plaintiff Files Motion for New Trial

    Plaintiff in Cook v. Bard moved for new trial June 5, 2026, arguing flawed jury instructions and juror pressure to reach verdict by deadline. MDL pending case count reached 3,376.

  9. 2026-08

    Second Bellwether Trial Scheduled

    First fracture claim bellwether trial scheduled for August 18, 2026. MDL pending case count exceeded 3,500 as of July 2026. Three additional bellwether trials scheduled through February 2027.

Statute of limitations

MDL 3081 before Judge David Campbell in D. Ariz. has 2,694+ cases as of January 6, 2026. First bellwether trial scheduled April 21, 2026. Sources indicate 2-3 year SOL typical for most states; Florida provides 4 years. No federal preemption found; 510(k) clearance does not preempt state law claims. No tolling agreement cited in sources. Intake must verify: (1) Bard PowerPort model implanted, (2) date of implantation, (3) date of first complication/symptom, (4) date of diagnosis linking injury to device. Primary injuries: fracture, migration, infection, thrombosis, vascular injury, embolism.

Arizona

2 years from discovery

Rule: Arizona Revised Statutes § 12-542; discovery rule applies for latent defects

Discovery: Accrues when plaintiff knows or reasonably should know injury and its cause; MDL 3081 pending before Judge David Campbell in D. Ariz.

MDL 3081 (In Re: Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation) centralized here August 2023; bellwether trials begin April 21, 2026 per January 2026 update

California

2 years from discovery

Rule: Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1; discovery rule codified at § 338

Discovery: Accrues when injury is discovered or reasonably discoverable

Large plaintiff pool given population; no revival statute cited in sources

Florida

4 years from discovery

Rule: Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(a), (e); discovery rule applies

Discovery: Accrues when plaintiff knows or should know of injury with reasonable diligence

Longer SOL period; intake must verify exact implant date and complication timeline

New York

3 years from discovery

Rule: N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214(6); discovery rule applies

Discovery: Accrues when injury is discovered or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered

Substantial plaintiff pool; strict pleading requirements for product liability

Texas

2 years from discovery

Rule: Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003; discovery rule applies

Discovery: Accrues when injury becomes inherently undiscoverable and objectively verifiable

No revival statute cited; significant Bard implant volume in cancer treatment centers

Pennsylvania

2 years from discovery

Rule: 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5524(2); discovery rule applies

Discovery: Accrues when plaintiff knows or reasonably should know of injury and its cause

Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas historically receptive to mass torts; parallel state filings likely

StateSOLRuleDiscovery RuleNotes
Arizona2 years from discoveryArizona Revised Statutes § 12-542; discovery rule applies for latent defectsAccrues when plaintiff knows or reasonably should know injury and its cause; MDL 3081 pending before Judge David Campbell in D. Ariz.MDL 3081 (In Re: Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation) centralized here August 2023; bellwether trials begin April 21, 2026 per January 2026 update
California2 years from discoveryCal. Code Civ. Proc. § 335.1; discovery rule codified at § 338Accrues when injury is discovered or reasonably discoverableLarge plaintiff pool given population; no revival statute cited in sources
Florida4 years from discoveryFla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(a), (e); discovery rule appliesAccrues when plaintiff knows or should know of injury with reasonable diligenceLonger SOL period; intake must verify exact implant date and complication timeline
New York3 years from discoveryN.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214(6); discovery rule appliesAccrues when injury is discovered or with reasonable diligence should have been discoveredSubstantial plaintiff pool; strict pleading requirements for product liability
Texas2 years from discoveryTex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003; discovery rule appliesAccrues when injury becomes inherently undiscoverable and objectively verifiableNo revival statute cited; significant Bard implant volume in cancer treatment centers
Pennsylvania2 years from discovery42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5524(2); discovery rule appliesAccrues when plaintiff knows or reasonably should know of injury and its causePhiladelphia Court of Common Pleas historically receptive to mass torts; parallel state filings likely

Live intelligence

AI litigation brief

Bard PowerPort remains active mdl with 61 current signals in the accepted feed.

Overview

MDL 3081 is in active bellwether phase before Senior Judge David G. Campbell in D. Ariz. The second bellwether trial, Divelbliss v. Becton Dickinson, concluded September 2026 with a $40 million plaintiff verdict on catheter fracture claims. Three additional bellwether trials are scheduled: October 13, 2026; December 1, 2026; and February 2, 2027.

Key developments

  • PACER court filing on Dec 31: Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation
  • Bloomberg Law News news on Sep 28: Port Catheter Makers Fail to Escape Suit Before Bellwether Trial - Bloomberg Law News
  • MAUDE FDA alert on Aug 31: MAUDE Filing 50523203: PowerPort isp MRI 6F CHRONW/OS
  • PubMed research on Jul 31: Complication-related Removal of Central Venous Ports: Comparison of Subclavian and Upper Arm Approaches.

Trajectory

Court filings and press coverage are both active in MDL 3081, pointing to sustained litigation pressure rather than a one-off headline cycle. 6 live sources are contributing current context.

Editorial intelligence

MDL 3081 should stay on the lead docket watch because it is the primary consolidation vehicle for PowerPort.

Generated Sep 30, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC

61 events detected

Google News (10)

  • Port Catheter Makers Fail to Escape Suit Before Bellwether Trial - Bloomberg Law News

    Bloomberg Law NewsSep 28, 2026, 5:31 PM UTC
  • How PowerPort Verdict At Becton Dickinson (BDX) Has Changed Its Investment Story - simplywall.st

    simplywall.stSep 24, 2026, 8:00 PM UTC
  • Wagstaff & Cartmell helps plaintiff win $40M verdict over implanted catheter failure - The Business Journals

    The Business JournalsSep 15, 2026, 7:33 PM UTC
  • When a Chemo Port Breaks: Signs, Causes, and Bard PowerPort Trials Explained - The Legal Examiner

    The Legal ExaminerSep 11, 2026, 1:01 PM UTC
  • 2nd Bellwether Jury Awards $40M Verdict Over Bard's PowerPort Device - Law.com

    Law.comSep 8, 2026, 6:58 PM UTC
  • August Bellwether Trial for Bard PowerPort Injuries to Test Device Fracture Claims - The Legal Examiner

    The Legal ExaminerAug 12, 2026, 9:47 PM UTC
  • Bard PowerPort Lawsuits: Second Bellwether Trial to Test Device Fracture Claims - The Legal Examiner

    The Legal ExaminerAug 12, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • PowerPort Lawsuit 2026: Payouts, Eligibility, Updates - LawFold.com

    LawFold.comJun 23, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • Power Port Lawsuit 2026: Who Qualifies and What to Claim - LawFold.com

    LawFold.comJun 14, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Update 2026: What You Must Know - LawFold.com

    LawFold.comJun 2, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
StudyPubMed
Detected Sep 30, 2026, 10:07 AM UTC

Complication-related Removal of Central Venous Ports: Comparison of Subclavian and Upper Arm Approaches.

Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) • Tsushima Y • PMID 42614291 • Journal Article.

Confidence 74%Published Jul 31, 2026, 12:00 AM UTCSource →
StudyPubMed
Detected Sep 30, 2026, 10:07 AM UTC

Impact of an Educational Intervention on Nurses' Knowledge of Port Catheter Management: A Quasi-Experimental Pre-Post Study.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) • Mete B • PMID 42512689 • Journal Article.

Confidence 74%Published Jul 18, 2026, 12:00 AM UTCSource →
PACERJPMLmdl-3081-stubDec 31, 2099, 12:00 AM UTC

Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation

PACER docket filed in JPML: The plaintiffs are suing a group of companies that manufacture and distribute medical devices, specifically various models of implantable port catheters, alleging that these devices were defective and caused severe complications such as catheter fractures, infections, and thrombosis. The lawsuit cla

FILING_INSTRUCTIONSep 30, 2026, 9:05 AM UTC

Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies Manual

This document outlines the administrative policies and procedures for electronic case filing in the District of Arizona, including definitions, general policies, registration, and login/password requirements.

PACERAZD2:26-cv-06871Sep 24, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation

PACER docket entry from AZD: COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 405.00, receipt number AAZDC-26168132 filed by Chelsea Voss. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MAR) (Entered: 09/29/2026)

PACERAZD2:26-cv-06870Sep 24, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation

PACER docket entry from AZD: COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 405.00, receipt number AAZDC-26167908 filed by Kimberly Dawn Marler. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MAR) (Entered: 09/29/2026)

PACERAZD2:26-cv-06869Sep 24, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation

PACER docket entry from AZD: COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 405.00, receipt number AAZDC-26167729 filed by Michaela Dayne Burgin. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MAR) (Entered: 09/29/2026)

PACERAZD2:26-cv-06868Sep 24, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation

PACER docket entry from AZD: COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 405.00, receipt number AAZDC-26167690 filed by Cynthia Jean Brewer. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MAR) (Entered: 09/29/2026)

PACERAZD2:26-cv-06867Sep 24, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation

PACER docket entry from AZD: COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 405.00, receipt number AAZDC-26167395 filed by Cynthia Darlene Moody-Cross. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MAR) (Entered: 09/29/2026)

PACERAZD2:26-cv-06866Sep 24, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation

PACER docket entry from AZD: COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 405.00, receipt number AAZDC-26166785 filed by Jodi Daby. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MAR) (Entered: 09/29/2026)

PACERAZD2:26-cv-06865Sep 24, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation

PACER docket entry from AZD: COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 405.00, receipt number AAZDC-26166785 filed by Rosemary Propst. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MAR) (Entered: 09/29/2026)

PACERAZD2:26-cv-06864Sep 24, 2026, 12:00 AM UTC

Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation

PACER docket entry from AZD: COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 405.00, receipt number AAZDC-26166737 filed by Barbara Gregory. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MAR) (Entered: 09/29/2026)

Sign in to view all 24 filings

Workbench

Sign in to save litigations, capture notes, and monitor live signals. Sign in for unlimited.

LexGenius Ranking

88Score

Court, news, and regulatory activity are elevated

Evidence16 / 20
Momentum20 / 20
Exposure16 / 20
Regulatory16 / 20
Legal20 / 20

Monitoring

Live

monitoring

Last: Sep 30, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC

Next: —

Source Monitoring

PACER

1m 30s

PACER

1m 30s

Google News

1m 30s

MAUDE

1m 30s

PubMed

16m 30s

Event feed

61

events detected

Google NewsPACERMAUDEPubMed

AI Brief

Bard PowerPort remains active mdl with 61 current signals in the accepted feed.

Overview

MDL 3081 is in active bellwether phase before Senior Judge David G. Campbell in D. Ariz. The second bellwether trial, Divelbliss v. Becton Dickinson, concluded September 2026 with a $40 million plaintiff verdict on catheter fracture claims. Three additional bellwether trials are scheduled: October 13, 2026; December 1, 2026; and February 2, 2027.

Key developments

PACER court filing on Dec 31: Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation. ‖ Bloomberg Law News news on Sep 28: Port Catheter Makers Fail to Escape Suit Before Bellwether Trial - Bloomberg Law News. ‖ MAUDE FDA alert on Aug 31: MAUDE Filing 50523203: PowerPort isp MRI 6F CHRONW/OS. ‖ PubMed research on Jul 31: Complication-related Removal of Central Venous Ports: Comparison of Subclavian and Upper Arm Approaches..

Generated Sep 30, 2026, 10:00 AM UTC

Tracked MDLs

MDL 3081

D. Ariz.

Bard implanted port catheter products liability

← Previous

Social Media

Monitors litigation and policy activity tied to social-media harms, platform design claims, and youth-safety debates.

Next →

AngioDynamics Port Catheter

Tracks MDL 3125 port-catheter litigation, device-safety reporting, and medical literature for AngioDynamics/Navilyst SmartPort, Xcela, BioFlo, and Vortex devices.