Abbott SCSPENDING
Nevro SCSPENDING
Cyclosporiasis OutbreakPENDING
Dupixent CTCLNEW MDL
Boston Sci. SCSNEW MDL
AI Chatbot Harm
NEWMONITOR
Roundup
ACTIVE
AFFF
ACTIVE
Depo-Provera
QUIET
Talc
QUIET
PFAS
ACTIVE
NEC Formula
ACTIVE
Bard Hernia Mesh
QUIET
Covidien Hernia Mesh
ACTIVE
Camp Lejeune
ACTIVE
Paraquat
ACTIVE
Social Media
ACTIVE
PowerPort
ACTIVE
AngioDynamics Port
ACTIVE
EtO Sterilization
ACTIVE
Hair Relaxer
ACTIVE
Paragard
ACTIVE
Suboxone Teeth
ACTIVE
Uber Assault
ACTIVE
Lyft Assault
ACTIVE
Ozempic Gastroparesis
ACTIVE
Ozempic NAION
MONITOR
Church Abuse
ACTIVE
1,4-Dioxane
MONITOR
Hotel Trafficking
ACTIVE
Boy Scouts
QUIET
LDS Abuse
ACTIVE
Keytruda
ACTIVE
Tylenol
ACTIVE
Assembly of God
ACTIVE
Video Game Addiction
ACTIVE
CA Women's Prisons
ACTIVE
Zantac
ACTIVE
ByHeart Formula
MONITOR
Cartiva
MONITOR
Roblox
ACTIVE
Sports Betting
MONITOR
Baby Food Metals
QUIET
Benzene Litigation
ACTIVE
Discord Abuse
ACTIVE
Social Media Sextortion
MONITOR
UPF Litigation
MONITOR
47Tracked
28Active
3Pending
Navigation
Abbott SCSPENDING
Nevro SCSPENDING
Cyclosporiasis OutbreakPENDING
Dupixent CTCLNEW MDL
Boston Sci. SCSNEW MDL
AI Chatbot Harm
NEWMONITOR
Roundup
ACTIVE
AFFF
ACTIVE
Depo-Provera
QUIET
Talc
QUIET
PFAS
ACTIVE
NEC Formula
ACTIVE
Bard Hernia Mesh
QUIET
Covidien Hernia Mesh
ACTIVE
Camp Lejeune
ACTIVE
Paraquat
ACTIVE
Social Media
ACTIVE
PowerPort
ACTIVE
AngioDynamics Port
ACTIVE
EtO Sterilization
ACTIVE
Hair Relaxer
ACTIVE
Paragard
ACTIVE
Suboxone Teeth
ACTIVE
Uber Assault
ACTIVE
Lyft Assault
ACTIVE
Ozempic Gastroparesis
ACTIVE
Ozempic NAION
MONITOR
Church Abuse
ACTIVE
1,4-Dioxane
MONITOR
Hotel Trafficking
ACTIVE
Boy Scouts
QUIET
LDS Abuse
ACTIVE
Keytruda
ACTIVE
Tylenol
ACTIVE
Assembly of God
ACTIVE
Video Game Addiction
ACTIVE
CA Women's Prisons
ACTIVE
Zantac
ACTIVE
ByHeart Formula
MONITOR
Cartiva
MONITOR
Roblox
ACTIVE
Sports Betting
MONITOR
Baby Food Metals
QUIET
Benzene Litigation
ACTIVE
Discord Abuse
ACTIVE
Social Media Sextortion
MONITOR
UPF Litigation
MONITOR
47Tracked
28Active
3Pending
LexGenius Logo
LexGeniusYour Edge in Mass Litigation
PricingDaily DocketTrack litigations freeSign in
LexGenius

LexGenius

Your Edge in Mass Litigation

DisclaimerAcceptable UseTermsPrivacyCookie PolicySupport

© 2026 LexGenius. All rights reserved.

Pending consolidation● EMERGING32 eventsMedical Device

Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulators

Medical Device · claims that Nevro HFX, Senza, and Omnia spinal cord stimulator systems caused neurological injury, device malfunction, autonomic complications, worsened pain, and failed pain relief

Defendant

Nevro Corporation

MDL / Track

MDL 3195

C.D. Cal. (requested)

Judge

Judge Josephine L. Staton (requested)

Plaintiffs

17 pending (per June 2026 centralization petition)

Bellwether / Trial

No verdicts

Settlement Status

  • No settlements in product liability litigation
  • 2022 patent settlement with Boston Scientific ($85 million) unrelated to device injury claims
Home/Torts/Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulators
SharePost on XShare on BlueskyShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookEmail

Track litigations for free. Save this matter, capture notes, and monitor live signals.

Sign in
← Torts Case overview Litigation status Geographic exposure Key defendants Timeline Statute of limitations Live activity News PubMed openFDA Court filings

Case overview

Individual product liability actions are proceeding against Nevro Corp. and parent Globus Medical over Senza, Senza II, Senza Omnia, and HFX spinal cord stimulation systems, with at least one case, Yusnukis v. Nevro Corp., No. 1:24-cv-00355 (D.N.M.), surviving a preemption challenge in February 2026. Plaintiffs allege manufacturing defects, failure to warn, and fraudulent misrepresentation regarding device performance, with claims that permanent implants malfunctioned or deviated from FDA-approved specifications after trial systems performed differently.

Causation Theory

Plaintiffs allege Nevro's high-frequency (10 kHz) SCS systems caused painful stimulation, lead migration, nerve damage, syncopal episodes, and incontinence requiring explant or revision surgery. The SENZA-NSRBP randomized controlled trial, published in Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine in 2022, reported a 2.1% explant rate at 12 months, though plaintiffs contend real-world failure rates exceed trial data due to inadequate testing of device modifications and improper programming by company representatives.

Case Management Orders

Litigation status

Nevro spinal cord stimulator product liability litigation remains in pre-MDL posture. A centralization petition identifying 17 cases across six jurisdictions was filed with the JPML on or about June 26, 2026, seeking assignment to the Central District of California alongside MDL-3181 (Boston Scientific). No hearing date has been set. The JPML declined to create a single industry-wide spinal cord stimulator MDL in its June 5, 2026 transfer order.

MDL Track

MDL 3195

Nevro HFX, Senza, and Omnia spinal cord stimulator products liability

State Court Activity

Cases pending in at least six jurisdictions per centralization petition; individual district court dismissals in D.N.M. (Yusnukis, Feb. 2026) and M.D. La. (Greene, Jan. 2025) on preemption grounds

Geographic exposure

Nevro reports 80,000+ patients globally treated with 10 kHz Therapy as of 2022. No MDL established as of August 2026. Device systems: HFX iQ, Senza, Senza II, Senza Omnia. Reported injuries include permanent neuropathy, paralysis, syncope, incontinence, device malfunction, loss of pain relief, and autonomic complications. Active litigation in Louisiana and New Mexico federal courts with parallel federal claims surviving initial preemption challenges.

  • Louisiana

    Active litigation in M.D. Louisiana: Greene v. Nevro Corp., No. 3:23-cv-01648-JWD-RLB (Judge John W. deGravelles). Plaintiff alleges permanent nerve damage, loss of ambulation following Senza SCS implantation December 2022. Court granted motion to dismiss with leave to amend January 31, 2025; 28-day amendment window. Parallel federal claims survive preemption challenge.

  • New Mexico

    Active litigation in D. New Mexico: Yusnukis v. Nevro Corp., No. 1:24-cv-00355. Plaintiff alleges syncopal episodes, incontinence, device explantation after 49 days. Claims include manufacturing defect, failure to warn, fraud, and N.M. Unfair Practices Act violations. Nevro preemption motion pending resolution February 2026.

  • Costa Rica (Manufacturing)

    FDA-approved manufacturing facility in Coyol Free Trade Zone, Alajuela, operational since October 2022. Produces HFX platform, Senza, and Omnia SCS systems for global distribution. Facility implicated in deviation-from-specification allegations in pending U.S. litigation.

  • California (Corporate)

    Nevro Corp. headquartered Redwood City. Corporate defendant in nationwide litigation. HFX iQ, Senza Omnia systems designed and marketed from California operations.

Key defendants

Nevro Corporation

Role: Manufacturer / primary product-liability defendant

The petition targets HFX, Senza, and Omnia SCS systems and alleges product defect, warnings, negligence, warranty, misrepresentation, consumer-protection, PMA supplement, and surveillance failures.

Globus Medical, Inc.

Role: Parent / named defendant where applicable

The motion states Nevro became a wholly owned subsidiary of Globus Medical in April 2025, and Globus is named in some cases where applicable.

United States Food and Drug Administration

Role: APA defendant in many listed cases

Nine federal cases reportedly name FDA under APA theories involving PMA supplement handling, QSR/CGMP obligations, adverse-event reporting, labeling, warnings, and post-market surveillance.

DefendantRoleIntelligence Note
Nevro CorporationManufacturer / primary product-liability defendantThe petition targets HFX, Senza, and Omnia SCS systems and alleges product defect, warnings, negligence, warranty, misrepresentation, consumer-protection, PMA supplement, and surveillance failures.
Globus Medical, Inc.Parent / named defendant where applicableThe motion states Nevro became a wholly owned subsidiary of Globus Medical in April 2025, and Globus is named in some cases where applicable.
United States Food and Drug AdministrationAPA defendant in many listed casesNine federal cases reportedly name FDA under APA theories involving PMA supplement handling, QSR/CGMP obligations, adverse-event reporting, labeling, warnings, and post-market surveillance.

Timeline

  1. 2026-07-13

    MORENKO v. Globus Medical Filed

    PACER filing in employment discrimination action against Globus Medical, Inc. under Family Medical Leave Act; docketed as lead item in MDL 3195 feed monitoring. Case No. 2:26-cv-04852.

  2. 2026-06-30

    FDA MAUDE Filings for Senza SCS

    Multiple adverse event reports filed in FDA MAUDE database for Nevro Senza spinal cord stimulator system, including filings 25664456, 25664424, 25664325, 25664279 (injury) and 25664268 (malfunction).

  3. 2026-06-18

    New MDL Created for Spinal Cord Stimulator Litigation

    Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation creates new MDL for spinal cord stimulator lawsuits; coverage notes MDL 3195 as primary consolidation vehicle for Nevro HFX, Senza, and Omnia product liability claims.

  4. 2025-04-03

    Globus Medical Completes Nevro Acquisition

    Globus Medical Inc. closes all-cash acquisition of Nevro Corp. for approximately $250 million ($5.85 per share), making Nevro a wholly owned subsidiary and ending its run as independent public company.

  5. 2025-02-06

    Globus Medical Announces Nevro Acquisition

    Globus Medical Inc. announces definitive agreement to acquire Nevro Corp. for $250 million; creates successor liability framework for Nevro SCS product claims.

  6. 2025-01-31

    Greene v. Nevro: Preemption Motion Granted with Leave to Amend

    Middle District of Louisiana grants Nevro's motion to dismiss state law product liability claims as preempted by Medical Device Amendments; plaintiff given 28 days to amend complaint to plead parallel federal violations. Case No. 3:23-cv-01648-JWD-RLB, Judge John W. deGravelles.

  7. 2024-08-13

    Yusnukis Files Amended Complaint Against Nevro

    Plaintiff Ron Yusnukis files First Amended Complaint in District of New Mexico alleging manufacturing defect, failure to warn, negligence, fraud, and breach of warranties related to HFX Omnia SCS implant; device explanted after 49 days. Case No. 1:24-cv-00355.

  8. 2024-04-12

    Yusnukis v. Nevro Filed

    Original complaint filed in District of New Mexico against Nevro Corporation alleging injuries from HFX Omnia spinal cord stimulator.

  9. 2021-07

    FDA Approves Senza for Diabetic Neuropathy

    FDA grants approval for Nevro's Senza System for treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN), expanding labeled indication beyond chronic back and leg pain.

  10. 2015

    FDA Approves Senza SCS System

    FDA grants premarket approval for Nevro's Senza Spinal Cord Stimulation System for 10 kHz high-frequency therapy, unlocking U.S. commercial market for chronic back and leg pain.

Statute of limitations

Nevro SCS claims depend on state product-liability statutes, implant/explant dates, symptom onset, discovery of device causation, and tolling agreements. The JPML petition specifically flags a tolling agreement through August 1, 2026 for movants’ counsel, but that may not protect every claimant.

⚠ 4 states with critical SOL — act immediately

⚠California

Generally 2 years for personal injury

Rule: Accrual generally turns on injury and discovery of suspected wrongful cause.

Discovery: May defer accrual until plaintiff reasonably suspects Nevro device involvement.

⚠Pennsylvania

Generally 2 years for personal injury

Rule: Important because petition identifies several Pennsylvania state-court Nevro filings.

Discovery: Discovery rule may apply when device causation was not reasonably knowable.

⚠Texas

Generally 2 years for personal injury

Rule: Product-injury claims often require prompt filing from injury or discovery.

⚠Florida

Generally 2 years for negligence-based personal injury after 2023 tort-reform changes

Rule: Accrual and choice-of-law analysis can be case-specific for device implantation and injury locations.

StateSOLRuleDiscovery RuleNotes
⚠CaliforniaGenerally 2 years for personal injuryAccrual generally turns on injury and discovery of suspected wrongful cause.May defer accrual until plaintiff reasonably suspects Nevro device involvement.—
⚠PennsylvaniaGenerally 2 years for personal injuryImportant because petition identifies several Pennsylvania state-court Nevro filings.Discovery rule may apply when device causation was not reasonably knowable.—
⚠TexasGenerally 2 years for personal injuryProduct-injury claims often require prompt filing from injury or discovery.——
⚠FloridaGenerally 2 years for negligence-based personal injury after 2023 tort-reform changesAccrual and choice-of-law analysis can be case-specific for device implantation and injury locations.——

Live intelligence

AI litigation brief

Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulators remains pending consolidation with 32 current signals in the accepted feed.

Overview

Nevro spinal cord stimulator product liability litigation remains in pre-MDL posture. A centralization petition identifying 17 cases across six jurisdictions was filed with the JPML on or about June 26, 2026, seeking assignment to the Central District of California alongside MDL-3181 (Boston Scientific). No hearing date has been set. The JPML declined to create a single industry-wide spinal cord stimulator MDL in its June 5, 2026 transfer order.

Key developments

  • The Legal Examiner news on Jul 27: How Do Spinal Cord Stimulators Fail? The Tech Behind Growing Defective Device Lawsuits - The Legal Examiner
  • MAUDE FDA alert on Jul 31: MAUDE Filing 50105005: Senza

Trajectory

Press and regulatory signals are moving in tandem for Nevro SCS. The next escalation check is whether these agency actions prompt new PACER filings or MDL scheduling orders.

Editorial intelligence

MDL 3195 should stay on the lead docket watch because it is the primary consolidation vehicle for Nevro SCS.

Generated Aug 12, 2026, 2:00 AM UTC

32 events detected

Google News (7)

  • How Do Spinal Cord Stimulators Fail? The Tech Behind Growing Defective Device Lawsuits - The Legal Examiner

    The Legal ExaminerJul 27, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • Wisner Baum's Lawsuits Challenge FDA Oversight of Spinal Cord Implants - PR Newswire

    PR NewswireJul 22, 2026, 12:06 PM UTC
  • FDA, others sued for injuries from spinal cord stimulator - The Black Chronicle

    The Black ChronicleJul 14, 2026, 5:45 PM UTC
  • Plaintiffs Say Stimulator Makers Used FDA Supplement Pathway To Avoid New Trials - insights.citeline.com

    insights.citeline.comJul 2, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Grow, New MDL Created - The Legal Examiner

    The Legal ExaminerJun 18, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • Woman Says Spinal Device Caused Permanent Nerve Damage - Law360

    Law360May 18, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC
  • Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit 2026 Updates & Facts - LawFold.com

    LawFold.comApr 26, 2026, 7:00 AM UTC

No recent PubMed signals. Monitoring is active — this section updates automatically.

No recent court filing signals. Monitoring is active — this section updates automatically.

Workbench

Sign in to save litigations, capture notes, and monitor live signals. Sign in for unlimited.

LexGenius Ranking

90Score

Court, news, and regulatory activity are elevated

Evidence16 / 20
Momentum14 / 20
Exposure20 / 20
Regulatory20 / 20
Legal20 / 20

Monitoring

Live

monitoring

Last: Aug 12, 2026, 2:00 AM UTC

Next: —

Source Monitoring

PACER

3m 02s

PACER

Pending

Google News

3m 02s

MAUDE

13m 02s

PubMed

28m 02s

Event feed

32

events detected

Google NewsMAUDE

AI Brief

Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulators remains pending consolidation with 32 current signals in the accepted feed.

Overview

Nevro spinal cord stimulator product liability litigation remains in pre-MDL posture. A centralization petition identifying 17 cases across six jurisdictions was filed with the JPML on or about June 26, 2026, seeking assignment to the Central District of California alongside MDL-3181 (Boston Scientific). No hearing date has been set. The JPML declined to create a single industry-wide spinal cord stimulator MDL in its June 5, 2026 transfer order.

Key developments

The Legal Examiner news on Jul 27: How Do Spinal Cord Stimulators Fail? The Tech Behind Growing Defective Device Lawsuits - The Legal Examiner. ‖ MAUDE FDA alert on Jul 31: MAUDE Filing 50105005: Senza.

Generated Aug 12, 2026, 2:00 AM UTC

Tracked MDLs

MDL 3195

Pending consolidation

Nevro HFX, Senza, and Omnia spinal cord stimulator products liability

Motion to Consolidate

← Previous

Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulators

Tracks pending JPML consolidation proceedings alleging Abbott spinal cord stimulator devices caused neurological injury, device migration, failed pain relief, and other serious complications.

Next →

Dupixent CTCL

Tracks litigation alleging Regeneron/Sanofi's dupilumab causes cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Centralized in MDL 3180 by JPML transfer order.